Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:003020) Adds CN¥515m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 60% Stake in That Gain
Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:003020) Adds CN¥515m in Market Cap and Insiders Have a 60% Stake in That Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 2 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 立方製藥存在重要的內部控制,表明對公司增長有着既得利益
- 前兩大股東擁有該公司的54%。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:003020), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解合肥立方製藥股份有限公司(SZSE:003020)真正控制着公司的人是誰,重要的是要了解該企業的所有權結構。擁有公司股份數量最多的集團,大約佔公司股份的60%,是個別內部人員。換句話說,這個集團將從他們投資於公司中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥515m last week.
顯然,內部人員在上週公司市值增加51500萬人民幣後受益最大。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究每一種立方製藥的所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical?
機構所有權告訴我們關於立方製藥有哪些信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在立方製藥擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過股票並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,那麼股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,看看立方製藥的歷史收入數據是值得的。當然,未來真正重要。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical. The company's largest shareholder is Junqiu Ji, with ownership of 47%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.4% by the third-largest shareholder.
對立方製藥的股東中,對沖基金持有的股份不多。該公司最大的股東是冀均秋,持有47%的股權。爲了更好地理解,第二大股東持有約7.0%的流通股份,第三大股東持有3.4%的股權。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical
立方製藥的內部人持有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.8b, that means they have CN¥2.3b worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,立方製藥有限公司的內部持有者擁有大部分股權。這意味着他們可以共同爲公司做決定。考慮到它的市值爲人民幣38億,這意味着他們持有價值23億的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,顯示與股東之間有良好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部持有者是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 35% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有35%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對立方製藥有一定影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以使政策決定朝他們的方向偏,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Hefei Lifeon Pharmaceutical has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
始終值得考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解立方製藥,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,要考慮風險 - 立方製藥有1個預警信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。