share_log

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Luzhou Bank (HKG:1983) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Year

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Luzhou Bank (HKG:1983) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Year

正面收益增長還不足以讓瀘州銀行(HKG:1983)股東在過去一年裏獲得一個良好的回報
Simply Wall St ·  10/03 19:44

Investors can approximate the average market return by buying an index fund. But if you buy individual stocks, you can do both better or worse than that. That downside risk was realized by Luzhou Bank Co., Ltd. (HKG:1983) shareholders over the last year, as the share price declined 25%. That falls noticeably short of the market return of around 25%. At least the damage isn't so bad if you look at the last three years, since the stock is down 17% in that time.

投資者可以通過購買指數基金來估算平均市場回報。但是,如果你買入個股,你的表現可能比這更好或更差。去年,由於股價下跌了25%,瀘州銀行股份有限公司(HKG: 1983)的股東意識到了這種下行風險。這明顯低於約25%的市場回報率。如果你看一下過去三年,至少損失還不錯,因爲當時該股下跌了17%。

On a more encouraging note the company has added HK$462m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the one-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,該公司的市值在過去7天內就增加了4.62億港元,因此讓我們看看我們能否確定是什麼導致了股東一年的虧損。

To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

引用巴菲特的話說:「船隻將在世界各地航行,但Flat Earth Society將蓬勃發展。市場上的價格和價值之間將繼續存在巨大差異...」通過比較每股收益(EPS)和一段時間內的股價變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度是如何隨着時間的推移而變化的。

During the unfortunate twelve months during which the Luzhou Bank share price fell, it actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 39%. It could be that the share price was previously over-hyped.

在瀘州銀行股價下跌的不幸十二個月中,其每股收益(EPS)實際上增長了39%。可能是股價此前被過度炒作。

The divergence between the EPS and the share price is quite notable, during the year. So it's well worth checking out some other metrics, too.

在這一年中,每股收益和股價之間的差異非常明顯。因此,也值得查看其他一些指標。

We don't see any weakness in the Luzhou Bank's dividend so the steady payout can't really explain the share price drop. From what we can see, revenue is pretty flat, so that doesn't really explain the share price drop. Of course, it could simply be that it simply fell short of the market consensus expectations.

我們認爲瀘州銀行的股息沒有任何疲軟,因此穩定的派息並不能真正解釋股價的下跌。據我們所見,收入相當平穩,因此這並不能真正解釋股價下跌的原因。當然,可能只是它沒有達到市場共識的預期。

The company's revenue and earnings (over time) are depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers).

公司的收入和收益(隨着時間的推移)如下圖所示(點擊查看確切數字)。

big
SEHK:1983 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 3rd 2024
SEHK: 1983 年收益和收入增長 2024 年 10 月 3 日

We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Luzhou Bank's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

像我們一樣,內部人士在過去的十二個月中一直在購買股票。話雖如此,大多數人認爲收益和收入增長趨勢是更有意義的業務指南。不妨看看我們關於瀘州銀行收益、收入和現金流的免費報告。

What About Dividends?

分紅呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Luzhou Bank's TSR for the last 1 year was -19%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

重要的是要考慮任何給定股票的股東總回報率和股價回報率。基於股息再投資的假設,股東總回報率納入了任何分拆或貼現資本籌集的價值以及任何股息。因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司來說,股東總回報率通常遠高於股價回報率。碰巧的是,瀘州銀行過去1年的股東總回報率爲-19%,超過了前面提到的股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!

A Different Perspective

不同的視角

While the broader market gained around 25% in the last year, Luzhou Bank shareholders lost 19% (even including dividends). However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 1.4% over the last half decade. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Luzhou Bank that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管去年整體市場上漲了約25%,但瀘州銀行的股東損失了19%(甚至包括股息)。但是,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月內表現不如市場。不幸的是,去年的表現可能預示着尚未解決的挑戰,因爲它比過去五年1.4%的年化虧損還要糟糕。我們意識到羅斯柴爾德男爵曾說過,投資者應該 「在街頭流血時買入」,但我們警告說,投資者應首先確保他們購買的是高質量的企業。儘管市場狀況可能對股價產生的不同影響值得考慮,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了瀘州銀行的1個警告信號,在投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

Luzhou Bank is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.

瀘州銀行並不是唯一內部人士買入的股票。因此,看看這份內部人士一直在購買的估值誘人的小盤股公司的免費清單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Hong Kong exchanges.

請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在香港交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論