Acrel Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300286) CEO Zhong Zhou Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 27% Last Week
Acrel Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300286) CEO Zhong Zhou Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 27% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- AcrelLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 53% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in AcrelLtd is 18%
- AcrelLtd的重要內部持股表明對公司擴張具有固有利益
- 五大股東佔了該公司53%的股權。
- AcrelLtd的機構持股比例爲18%
A look at the shareholders of Acrel Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300286) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 40% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看Acrel Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300286)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最具實力。我們可以看到個人內部持有公司40%的所有權。換句話說,該群體將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥931m last week.
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥93100萬 last week.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AcrelLtd.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about AcrelLtd.
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AcrelLtd?
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AcrelLtd?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that AcrelLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AcrelLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
We can see that AcrelLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AcrelLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in AcrelLtd. With a 19% stake, CEO Zhong Zhou is the largest shareholder. Shanghai Qianhang Investment Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Jianming Wu holds about 7.5% of the company stock.
我們注意到,對AcrelLtd.而言,對沖基金的投資並不重要。首席執行官鄭舟持有19%的股份,是最大的股東。上海錢航投資有限公司持有16%的普通股,是第二大股東,吳建明持有公司股份的約7.5%。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實,即約53%的公司由前5大股東控制,這表明這些所有者在業務上具有重要的影響力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of AcrelLtd
AcrelLtd的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Acrel Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.8b worth of shares in the CN¥4.4b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
內部人士擁有佳勝科技有限公司相當比例的股份。內部人士在這家價值4400000000人民幣的公司中擁有18億人民幣的股份。看到內部人士如此投入業務真是太棒了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in AcrelLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在佳勝科技有限公司持有24%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 16%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司股份的16%。可能值得更深入地研究這一點。如果相關方如內部人士在這些私營公司之一中有利益,那麼應在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AcrelLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - AcrelLtd has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考慮到公司股東的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解AcrelLtd,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉例來說,承擔風險- AcrelLtd有1個警示信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。