Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002741) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Insiders
Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002741) 17% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders own 44% of Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech
- 光華科技的重要零售投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更廣泛公衆股東的影響
- 前6大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
- 內部人員擁有光華科技44%的股份
Every investor in Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002741) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 45% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
深圳股票交易所(SZSE:002741)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東團體。 零售投資者擁有公司中最大的股份,佔45%。 換句話說,該團體將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 17% price gain, insiders also received a 44% cut.
上週股價上漲17%後,零售投資者是收益最大的群體,內部人士也獲得了44%的份額。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了對廣東光華科技不同所有權群體的審視。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech?
機構持有份額對廣東光華科技有何啓示?由於機構只持有廣東光華科技的一小部分股份,因此很多人可能沒有花費太多時間來考慮該股票。但顯然有些人這樣做了,並且他們足夠喜歡它以至於不惜購買。如果業務從這裏變強,我們可能會看到情況發生變化,會有更多機構希望購買。如果多個機構投資者試圖同時購買某隻股票,股價上漲是很常見的。因此,請查看下面的歷史收益軌跡,但要記住,未來才是最重要的。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在廣東光華科技中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一支股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查廣東光華科技的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech. Our data shows that Chuang Fa Zheng is the largest shareholder with 26% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Ren Zheng and Han Zhao Chen, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.2%. Two of the top three shareholders happen to be Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, respectively. That is, insiders feature higher up in the heirarchy of the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到,對於光華科技,對沖基金並沒有進行實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,莊發政是最大的股東,持有26%的股份。第二和第三大股東是任政和韓昭臣,他們的股份比例分別爲6.2%。三大股東中有兩位恰好是首席執行官和董事長。也就是說,內部人員在公司頂級股東層級中更高。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech
我們的信息表明,內部人士在廣東光華科技股份有限公司中持有相當大的股份。內部人士在這個市值420億人民幣的企業中擁有19億人民幣的股份,這是令人高興的事情。如果這些內部人士最近一直在買入,那麼可能值得檢查。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.7b, and insiders have CN¥2.5b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在光華科技保持着一筆可觀的持股。其市值僅爲57億元人民幣,而內部人士名下擁有價值25億元人民幣的股份。看到內部人士對業務投入如此之大真是太好了。也許值得查看一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 45% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆--包括散戶投資者--持有該公司45%的股份,因此無法輕易忽略。儘管這樣的股份相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不符,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.3%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司4.3%的股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得考慮誰擁有這些私人公司的股份。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.
我覺得查看公司的股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險- 光華科技有2個警示信號(1個是重要的),我們認爲你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。