The Recent 18% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Jianhua Shen's Week, Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301092) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 18% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Jianhua Shen's Week, Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301092) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The largest shareholder of the company is Jianhua Shen with a 52% stake
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 內部人員似乎對浙江正廣實業的增長充滿興趣,這可以從他們的大量持股中看出
- 該公司的最大股東是申建華,持有52%的股份
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301092), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制浙江正廣實業股份有限公司(SZSE:301092),那就必須看一下其股東名冊的構成。個人內部人持有73%的股份,在公司中持有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個團體將獲益最多(或在出現衰退時損失最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.3b market cap following a 18% gain in the stock.
因此,上週公司股價上漲18%,達到33億元人民幣的市值,內部人員得分最高。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於浙江正廣實業的什麼。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial?
機構投資缺失對浙江正廣實業意味着什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
爲什麼機構不持有某隻股票有多種解釋。最常見的是,相對於管理基金,公司規模太小,因此機構不會花太多時間仔細研究公司。 另一方面,專業投資者可能會避開某家公司,因爲他們認爲那不是他們的最佳投資選擇。浙江正廣實業公司的盈利和營業收入歷史數據(如下)可能不夠吸引機構投資者,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究過這家企業。
Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial is not owned by hedge funds. With a 52% stake, CEO Jianhua Shen is the largest shareholder. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. The second and third largest shareholders are Xuanming Wang and Fayong Lao, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 10.0%. Interestingly, the second and third-largest shareholders also happen to be the Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively. This once again signifies considerable insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
浙江正光實業不是由對沖基金所有。CEO沈建華持有52%的股份,是最大的股東。由於持有如此巨大的股權,我們推斷他們對公司未來有重要的控制權。當內部人士持有公司股份時,通常被視爲一個好跡象,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人員能夠參與其中。第二和第三大股東分別是玄明王和法勇老,持有等量的10.0%股份。有趣的是,第二和第三大股東也正好是高級主管和董事會成員,這再次表明公司最大股東中擁有相當數量的內部人士。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial
浙江正光實業的內部人員持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. That means they own CN¥2.4b worth of shares in the CN¥3.3b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來,內部人士擁有浙江正廣實業有限公司超過一半的股票。這賦予他們很大的權力。這意味着他們在這家價值330億人民幣的公司中擁有24億人民幣的股份。這相當有意義。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 26% stake in Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有浙江正廣實業26%的股份。雖然這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東的想法不協調,可能無法改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Zhejiang Zhengguang Industrial (including 1 which is concerning) .
思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解浙江正廣實業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的有關浙江正廣實業的2個警示信號(其中1個令人擔憂)。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。