share_log

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002460) Market Cap Rose CN¥6.3b Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 54% Profited and so Did Insiders

Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002460) Market Cap Rose CN¥6.3b Last Week; Retail Investors Who Hold 54% Profited and so Did Insiders

贛鋒鋰業集團有限公司(SZSE:002460)的市值上週上漲了63億人民幣;持有54%股份的零售投資者和內部人員都獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 20:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Ganfeng Lithium Group by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 41% of the company
  • 28% of Ganfeng Lithium Group is held by insiders
  • 零售投資者對贛鋒鋰業集團的重要控制意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面擁有更多權力
  • 前25名股東擁有公司股份的41%。
  • 贛鋒鋰業集團28%的股份由內部持有

If you want to know who really controls Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002460), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制贛鋒鋰業集團(SZSE:002460),那麼您需要查看其股東登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有公司中的絕大部分股權,佔據54%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's CN¥6.3b market cap gain, insiders too had a 28% share in those profits.

雖然零售投資者是上週人民幣63億市值增長中受益最多的群體,但內部人士也在這些利潤中持有28%的份額。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ganfeng Lithium Group.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對贛鋒鋰業集團可以告訴我們什麼。

big
SZSE:002460 Ownership Breakdown October 5th 2024
SZSE:002460 所有權分佈2024年10月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ganfeng Lithium Group?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於贛鋒鋰業集團?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Ganfeng Lithium Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ganfeng Lithium Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到贛鋒鋰業集團確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的一大部分。 這可能表明公司在投資社區擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎地依賴所謂的機構投資者帶來的認可。他們也有時會出錯。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查贛鋒鋰業集團的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:002460 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 5th 2024
SZSE:002460 營業收入和收益增長 2024年10月5日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ganfeng Lithium Group. The company's CEO Liangbin Li is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 1.5% of the stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Xiaoshen Wang is also President, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

我們注意到,對贛鋒鋰業的對沖基金並無實質性投資。 該公司的CEO梁斌李是最大的股東,持有20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約7.1%和1.5%的股票。有趣的是,第二大股東王小神也是總裁,再次表明公司頂級股東中存在較高的內部持股。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Ganfeng Lithium Group

贛鋒鋰業的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥18b worth of shares in the CN¥63b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

看來內部持有贛鋒鋰業有限公司相當大比例的股份。 內部人士持有價值180億人民幣的股份,佔據了這家價值630億人民幣的公司。 這是相當重要的。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望查看這份免費圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 54% of Ganfeng Lithium Group shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.

普通公衆,主要是由個人投資者組成,共同持有贛鋒鋰業集團54%的股份。 這種所有權水平使來自更廣泛公衆的投資者在一些重要政策決策方面具有一定的影響力,例如董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Ganfeng Lithium Group you should be aware of.

我發現了解一家公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但爲了真正洞悉,我們也需要考慮其他信息。就拿目前的情況來說:我們發現贛鋒鋰業存在1個警告信號,你應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論