share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Lens Technology (SZSE:300433) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Lens Technology (SZSE:300433) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項措施表明藍思科技(SZSE:300433)合理運用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 22:59

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Lens Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300433) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

大衛·伊本說得很好,他說:「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。」 當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是希望看看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過重會導致破產。我們注意到藍思科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300433)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務造成了多大風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還,無論是通過籌集資本還是利用自身現金流,才會成爲真正的問題。如果情況真的很糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債的公司因爲債權人強迫其以低價籌集資本而永久稀釋股東。當然,很多公司使用債務來實現增長,而沒有任何負面後果。在考慮公司債務水平時的第一步是考慮其現金和債務的綜合情況。

What Is Lens Technology's Debt?

Lens Technology的債務情況是什麼?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Lens Technology had CN¥14.5b of debt in June 2024, down from CN¥16.4b, one year before. On the flip side, it has CN¥7.99b in cash leading to net debt of about CN¥6.54b.

您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,但顯示藍思科技在2024年6月的債務爲145億人民幣,比一年前的164億人民幣有所減少。另一方面,現金爲79.9億人民幣,淨債務約爲65.4億人民幣。

big
SZSE:300433 Debt to Equity History October 5th 2024
SZSE:300433債務與股本歷史 2024年10月5日

How Healthy Is Lens Technology's Balance Sheet?

藍思科技的資產負債表如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Lens Technology had liabilities of CN¥17.7b due within 12 months and liabilities of CN¥10.3b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥7.99b as well as receivables valued at CN¥8.90b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total CN¥11.1b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到藍思科技在未來12個月內到期的負債爲177億元,而超過這一期限的負債爲103億元。 抵消這些義務的是,它持有的現金爲79.9億元,以及價值89億元的應收賬款,其中12個月內到期。 因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多111億元。

Since publicly traded Lens Technology shares are worth a very impressive total of CN¥101.0b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

由於公開交易的藍思科技股票總共價值1010億元,這種負債水平似乎不太可能構成重大威脅。 但是,我們認爲值得密切關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲隨着時間的推移可能會發生變化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。

Lens Technology has net debt of just 0.88 times EBITDA, suggesting it could ramp leverage without breaking a sweat. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So there's no doubt this company can take on debt while staying cool as a cucumber. The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for Lens Technology if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 30% cut to EBIT over the last year. Falling earnings (if the trend continues) could eventually make even modest debt quite risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Lens Technology can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

藍思科技的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.88倍,這表明它可以增加槓桿而不費力。 令人吃驚的是,儘管有淨債務,但在過去十二個月內,它實際上收到的利息比其需要支付的利息更多。 因此,毫無疑問,該公司可以負債而保持泰然自若。 如果管理層無法阻止去年EBIt削減30%的情況重演,那麼其債務負擔的適度性可能對藍思科技至關重要。盈利下降(如果趨勢持續下去)最終可能會使即使適度債務也變得相當風險。 在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是焦點領域。 但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定藍思科技是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您關注未來,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Lens Technology actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last two years. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,值得檢查有多少EBIt是由自由現金流支持的。對於任何股東而言,藍思科技實際上在過去兩年內產生的自由現金流比EBIt多。在維持貸款人的好感時,沒有比進賬現金更好的了。

Our View

我們的觀點

Lens Technology's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But the stark truth is that we are concerned by its EBIT growth rate. All these things considered, it appears that Lens Technology can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Lens Technology is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

藍思科技的利息保障表明它能夠像Cristiano Ronaldo輕鬆地在14歲以下門將面前進球一樣處理其債務。但殘酷的事實是,我們對其EBIt增長率感到擔憂。綜合考慮所有這些因素,似乎藍思科技能夠輕鬆地處理其當前的債務水平。從積極方面來看,這種槓桿可以提高股東回報,但潛在的下行風險是更多的損失風險,因此值得監控資產負債表。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中最多地了解債務。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。請注意,藍思科技在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警示信號,您應該知道...

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論