With 72% Ownership, DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
With 72% Ownership, DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DuPont de Nemours' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鑑於機構在股票中所佔比例較大,杜邦的股價可能受到它們交易決策的影響。
- 前25大股東持有47%的業務。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着杜邦杜邦(NYSE:DD)的業務,了解業務的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司72%的股權,即該團體將在股價上漲時獲益最多(或在股價出現下跌時損失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DuPont de Nemours.
讓我們仔細看一下,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於杜邦的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DuPont de Nemours?
機構持有權告訴我們關於杜邦德諾爾的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that DuPont de Nemours does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DuPont de Nemours' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到杜邦確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅憑這個事實就下結論,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像任何人一樣。 當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於 '擁擠交易' 的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 你可以在下方看到杜邦的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加豐富多彩。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. DuPont de Nemours is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的股份被機構持有,因此他們可以共同行使重要的權力。杜邦德尼莫斯並不是對沖基金所擁有的。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,持有股份的比例爲11%。第二大股東持有約7.0%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.7%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of DuPont de Nemours
杜邦德諾爾的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$67m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,杜邦公司的內部持股不到1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有很小的比例。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值6700萬美元的股份。看到至少部分內部持股總是好事,但也值得注意這些內部持有人是否一直在減持。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in DuPont de Nemours. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般大衆,通常是個人投資者,在杜邦公司持有27%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能左右決策,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for DuPont de Nemours that you should be aware of.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定杜邦的3個警示信號,您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。