share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That CDW (NASDAQ:CDW) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That CDW (NASDAQ:CDW) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項措施表明cdw(納斯達克:cdw)合理利用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  10/07 09:46

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies CDW Corporation (NASDAQ:CDW) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

傳奇基金經理李錄(受查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是是否會遭受到資本的永久損失。」因此,當您考慮任何特定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。與許多其他公司一樣,CDW公司(納斯達克: CDW)使用債務。但股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助業務,直到業務無法用新資本或自由現金流來償還爲止。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。然而,一種(但仍然昂貴)更爲常見的情況是,一家公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,特別是資本密集型企業。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務的總體情況。

What Is CDW's Debt?

CDW的債務情況是怎樣的?

As you can see below, CDW had US$6.03b of debt at June 2024, down from US$6.38b a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$665.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$5.37b.

正如您可以在下面看到的,截至2024年6月,CDW的債務爲60.3億美元,比前一年的63.8億美元有所減少。然而,由於其現金儲備爲6.653億美元,其淨債務更少,約爲53.7億美元。

big
NasdaqGS:CDW Debt to Equity History October 7th 2024
納斯達克:CDW債務與股本歷史數據2024年10月7日

How Healthy Is CDW's Balance Sheet?

CDW的資產負債表有多健康?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that CDW had liabilities of US$6.21b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$5.26b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$665.3m in cash and US$5.36b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$5.44b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

從最近的資產負債表中,我們可以看到CDW的短期到期負債爲621億美元,長期到期負債爲526億美元。與此相抵消的是,它有66530萬美元的現金和536億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的組合多544億美元。

Given CDW has a humongous market capitalization of US$29.6b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

考慮到CDW擁有296億美元龐大的市值,很難相信這些負債會構成太大威脅。然而,我們認爲值得密切關注其資產負債表的實力,因爲隨着時間的推移,情況可能會發生變化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

CDW has net debt to EBITDA of 2.7 suggesting it uses a fair bit of leverage to boost returns. On the plus side, its EBIT was 8.0 times its interest expense, and its net debt to EBITDA, was quite high, at 2.7. Importantly CDW's EBIT was essentially flat over the last twelve months. We would prefer to see some earnings growth, because that always helps diminish debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine CDW's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

CDW的淨債務與EBITDA之比爲2.7,表明其使用了相當多的槓桿來提高回報。好的一面是,其EBIt是利息支出的8.0倍,而其淨債務與EBITDA之比相當高,爲2.7。重要的是,CDW的EBIt在過去12個月基本持平。我們更希望看到一些盈利增長,因爲這有助於減少債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但將決定CDW未來能否保持健康資產負債表的,主要是未來的盈利。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會發現對分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, CDW produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 70% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。因此,值得查看多少EBIt受到自由現金流支持。在過去的三年中,CDW產生了可靠的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的70%,這正是我們所期待的。這筆真金白銀意味着它可以在希望時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that CDW's demonstrated ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But truth be told we feel its net debt to EBITDA does undermine this impression a bit. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that CDW can handle its debt fairly comfortably. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that CDW is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

好消息是,CDW展示了將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流的能力,這讓我們像小孩子喜歡小狗一樣開心。但實話實說,我們覺得其淨債務與EBITDA比例稍微削弱了這種印象。綜合考慮所有上述因素,CDW似乎可以相對輕鬆地處理其債務。從積極的一面看,這種槓桿可以提高股東回報率,但潛在的下行風險是更多的損失風險,因此值得監控資產負債表。毫無疑問,我們最多從資產負債表中了解到債務情況。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。請注意,CDW在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,你應該知道...

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論