Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as China Catalyst Holding Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688267) Market Cap Grew by CN¥440m Last Week
Insiders Were the Biggest Winners as China Catalyst Holding Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688267) Market Cap Grew by CN¥440m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in China Catalyst Holding's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutions own 11% of China Catalyst Holding
- 內部人員似乎對中國催化劑控股的增長有濃厚的興趣,這可以從他們持有的大量股權中看出
- 總共有5位投資者擁有該公司51%的所有權。
- 機構持有中國催化劑控股11%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of China Catalyst Holding Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688267), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 31% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着中國催化劑控股股份有限公司(SHSE:688267),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。持有最大股份的是持有31%股權的個人內部人員群體。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果股價下跌,他們將損失最多)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 12% gain.
因此,公司內部人員成爲上週12%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Catalyst Holding.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關中國催化控股的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Catalyst Holding?
機構持股告訴我們關於中國催化控股的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that China Catalyst Holding does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of China Catalyst Holding, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到中國催化控股確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且很喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試出售股票,那麼股價下跌也不足爲奇。因此,值得查看中國催化控股的過去盈利軌跡(下面)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
China Catalyst Holding is not owned by hedge funds. China Catalyst Group CO.,LTD. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. With 9.6% and 6.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Jin Li and Jing Wang are the second and third largest shareholders.
中國催化劑控股不是對沖基金所擁有。中國催化劑集團有限公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有27%的股份。分別持有9.6%和6.0%的股份,金立和靖王是第二和第三大股東。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of China Catalyst Holding
中國催化控股的內部人持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of China Catalyst Holding Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥4.0b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
最新數據顯示,業內人士擁有中國催化劑控股有限公司的相當比例。 內部人士在這家價值4000000000人民幣的公司中持有13億人民幣的股份。 我們認爲這表明與股東的利益一致,但有必要指出,該公司仍然規模相當小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。 您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over China Catalyst Holding. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大衆擁有中國催化劑控股的26%股權,主要由個人投資者組成,對公司有一定的影響力。 儘管這一所有權比例相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東的利益不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 31%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有發行股份的31%。僅從這個事實很難得出結論,所以值得觀察誰擁有這些私人公司。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - China Catalyst Holding has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例- 中國催化劑控股有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。