share_log

Public Companies Invested in ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$323m Market Cap Decline

Public Companies Invested in ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$323m Market Cap Decline

投資以色列化學有限公司(紐交所:ICL)的上市公司承受了上週3.23億美元市值下降的衝擊
Simply Wall St ·  10/09 07:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over ICL Group by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Institutions own 25% of ICL Group
  • 公共公司對以色列化學的重大控制意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
  • 共有2位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 機構擁有以色列化學25%的股份

A look at the shareholders of ICL Group Ltd (NYSE:ICL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 44% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看以色列化學有限公司(紐交所:ICL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。公共公司持有44%的股份,是該公司最大的股東。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 5.9% decline in share price, public companies suffered the most losses.

在上週股價下跌5.9%後,公共公司遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ICL Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於以色列化學的什麼。

big
NYSE:ICL Ownership Breakdown October 9th 2024
紐交所:以色列化學2024年10月9日的所有權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ICL Group?

機構持股告訴我們關於以色列化學的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

ICL Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ICL Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

以色列化學已經有機構持有股份登記。事實上,他們在公司持有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下面看到以色列化學的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住事情總有更多層面。

big
NYSE:ICL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 9th 2024
紐交所:以色列化學第四季度收益和營業收入增長2024年10月9日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in ICL Group. Our data shows that Israel Corporation Ltd is the largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

對沖基金在以色列化學集團中所持股份不多。我們的數據顯示,以色列化學有限公司是最大的股東,持有44%的流通股。第二大股東持有約6.1%的流通股,其次是第三大股東持有3.4%的所有流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of ICL Group

以色列化學集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of ICL Group Ltd in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$5.6m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,ICL Group Ltd的內部人員以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大型公司,內部人員擁有價值560萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ICL Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有31%股權的普通公衆,主要是個人投資者,對ICL Group有一定程度上的影響。儘管擁有的股權相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 44% of ICL Group stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

目前,公共公司擁有以色列化學44%的股份。 這可能是出於戰略利益考慮,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。 也可能是它們進行了拆分。 這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ICL Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for ICL Group you should be aware of.

思考公司股東的不同群體總是值得的。 但要更好地了解以色列化學,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 一個例子是:我們發現了2個應該注意的以色列化學2警示信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論