share_log

The Mosaic Company's (NYSE:MOS) Recent 6.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

The Mosaic Company's (NYSE:MOS) Recent 6.8% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

美國美盛公司(紐交所:MOS)最近下跌6.8%,進一步加劇了一年來的虧損,機構所有者可能採取極端措施。
Simply Wall St ·  10/10 06:36

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Mosaic's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中的大量持股,美國美盛的股價可能會容易受到他們的交易決策影響。
  • 前14名股東持有該公司50%的股權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls The Mosaic Company (NYSE:MOS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着美國美盛(紐交所:MOS),那麼你需要看看其股東登記冊的構成。機構持有87%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的機構。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 6.8% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 28% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Mosaic's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到其持股價值下跌了6.8%。 不用說,最近的損失進一步增加了股東一年來的28%的損失,特別是對於這類股東來說可能不太好。 機構投資者被稱爲"聰明的錢",它們對股價的走勢有很大的影響力。 因此,如果Mosaic的股價繼續走弱,機構投資者可能感到被迫出售股票,這對個人投資者可能不理想。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Mosaic.

讓我們仔細觀察不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Mosaic的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:MOS Ownership Breakdown October 10th 2024
紐交所:MOS所有權2024年10月10日拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mosaic?

機構持股告訴我們有關Mosaic的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Mosaic does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Mosaic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Mosaic確實有機構投資者;它們持有公司股票的一部分。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯投資錯誤,就像每個人都會。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌不是罕見的事。 因此,值得檢查Mosaic過去的收入軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:MOS Earnings and Revenue Growth October 10th 2024
紐交所:MOS盈利和營業收入增長2024年10月10日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Mosaic. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.9% and 4.5% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對於美國美盛,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是梵蒂岡集團,佔已發行股份的13%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約8.9%和4.5%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前14名股東合計持有該公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Mosaic

美國美盛的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Mosaic Company in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$38m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,美國美盛公司的內部持有人用自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部持有者擁有很少的這個比例。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值3800萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部持有,總是一件好事,但值得注意的是他們是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管該公司擁有相當大的股權,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Mosaic , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險這個始終存在的幽靈。我們已經確定了美國美盛存在3個警示信號,理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論