GD Power Development Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600795) Stock Price Dropped 4.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
GD Power Development Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:600795) Stock Price Dropped 4.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over GD Power DevelopmentLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- CHN ENERGY Investment Group Co.,Ltd owns 51% of the company
- 18% of GD Power DevelopmentLtd is held by Institutions
- 私人公司對國電電力公司的重大控制意味着普通公衆有更多的影響管理和治理決策的權力。
- 中國能源投資集團有限公司擁有該公司51%的股份
- 國電電力公司的18%股份被機構持有。
A look at the shareholders of GD Power Development Co.,Ltd (SHSE:600795) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
通過查看國電電力發展股份有限公司(SHSE:600795)的股東,我們可以了解哪個集團最強大。擁有該公司股份最多的集團,準確地說約爲52%,是私人公司。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.2%.
上週,隨着股票下跌了4.2%,私營公司遭受了最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GD Power DevelopmentLtd.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注國電電力股份有限公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GD Power DevelopmentLtd?
機構持股給我們提供了什麼關於國電電力公司的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
GD Power DevelopmentLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see GD Power DevelopmentLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
國電電力股份有限公司已經在股東名冊上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總有一種風險,即它們處於'擁擠的交易'狀態。當這種交易出現問題時,多個股東可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以在下面看到國電電力股份有限公司的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GD Power DevelopmentLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is CHN ENERGY Investment Group Co.,Ltd with 51% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. With 5.0% and 1.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, China Securities Finance Corp, Asset Management Arm and Central Huijin Asset Management Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們注意到,對於GD Power DevelopmentLtd,對沖基金並沒有有意義的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是中國能源投資集團有限公司,持有51%的股份。這意味着他們對公司未來具有絕對控制權。中國證券金融股份有限公司資產管理部分別持有5.0%和1.2%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of GD Power DevelopmentLtd
國電電力公司內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們注意到我們的數據不顯示任何董事會成員持有股份。考慮到我們沒有掌握內部持股情況,我們可能有缺失的數據。因此,有趣的是評估首席執行官的薪酬和任期。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GD Power DevelopmentLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆擁有30%的股權,主要由個別投資者組成,對國電電力有一定影響力。 雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the GD Power DevelopmentLtd stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司似乎擁有國電電力52%的股票。 私人公司可能是關聯方。 有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而對公共公司產生興趣,而不是以個人的身份。 雖然很難做出任何廣義的結論,但值得進一步研究。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand GD Power DevelopmentLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - GD Power DevelopmentLtd has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about.
值得考慮的是,不同的股東群體對公司股票的所有權。但是要更好地了解國電電力有限公司的情況,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例-國電電力有限公司有2個警示信號(其中1個令人擔憂),我們認爲您應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。