Zhejiang Hechuan Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688320) Last Week's 11% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Zhejiang Hechuan Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688320) Last Week's 11% Decline Must Have Disappointed Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Zhejiang Hechuan Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- 31% of Zhejiang Hechuan Technology is held by insiders
- 浙江河川科技的個人投資者擁有相當大的持股,表明他們在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權
- 共有9個投資者持有該公司的51%所有權
- 浙江河川科技31%的股份由內部持有
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Hechuan Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688320), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制浙江河川科技有限公司(SHSE:688320),那麼您將需要查看其股權結構。個人投資者持有34%的股份,是該公司擁有最多股份的一方。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或損失最多)。
Following a 11% decrease in the stock price last week, individual investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 31% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌11%後,個人投資者遭受最大損失,但持有31%股份的內部人員也遭受重創。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhejiang Hechuan Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解浙江合川科技的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Hechuan Technology?
機構持股情況告訴我們有關浙江合川科技的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Zhejiang Hechuan Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Hechuan Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
浙江合川科技已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖清倉某支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查浙江合川科技過去的收入軌跡(以下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zhejiang Hechuan Technology. Xiangbin Wang is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Quzhou Hechuan Investment Management Center (Limited Partnership) and Henghui Xiang are the second and third largest shareholders. Henghui Xiang, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Furthermore, CEO Xiaojie Xu is the owner of 3.0% of the company's shares.
我們注意到對浙江和川科技沒有意義的對沖基金投資。 王祥斌目前是最大的股東,持有15%的股份。 分別持有9.2%和7.2%的流通股份,衢州和川投資管理中心(有限合夥)和衡暉祥是第二和第三大股東。 衡暉翔是第三大股東,同時也是董事會成員。 此外,CEO徐曉傑擁有公司3.0%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管有必要研究公司的機構持股數據,但研究分析師的情緒也是有道理的,以了解風向。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但不多。因此,有提高更多的分析涵蓋面的空間。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Hechuan Technology
浙江和川科技的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhejiang Hechuan Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.3b worth of shares in the CN¥4.1b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
內部人士持有浙江和川科技有限公司的相當比例。內部人士在這家價值41000000000人民幣的公司中擁有13億元人民幣的股份。我們會說這顯示了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有公司34%的股份,因此不能輕鬆忽視。儘管持股規模很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 14%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有已發行股票的14%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步研究擁有這些私人公司的人。有時內部人員或其他關聯方通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Zhejiang Hechuan Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我發現了解一個公司究竟由誰擁有很有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險 - 浙江和川科技有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。