Private Equity Firms Are GrandiT Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688549) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥576m Last Week
Private Equity Firms Are GrandiT Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688549) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥576m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over GrandiT by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 股權投資公司對Grandit的重大控制意味着一般公衆具有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
- 總共有2家投資者持有該公司53%的所有權。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of GrandiT Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688549) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 33% stake, private equity firms possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看Grandit Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688549)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力量。私募股權公司擁有公司中的最大股份,佔33%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, private equity firms benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥576m last week.
顯然,在上週公司的市值上漲了CN¥57600萬之後,股權投資公司受益最多。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of GrandiT, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Grandit的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GrandiT?
機構持股究竟能告訴我們關於GrandiT的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
GrandiT already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see GrandiT's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Grandit已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。 的確,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股權。 這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。 不過,最好還是要警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。 他們有時也會犯錯。 當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在一種「擁擠交易」的風險。 當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。 這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以在下面看到GrandiT的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事永遠不止於此。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GrandiT. The company's largest shareholder is Huaxin Investment Management Co., Ltd., with ownership of 26%. Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 26% of common stock, and Quzhou Hengxin Enterprise Management Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 7.3% of the company stock.
我們注意到對Grandit沒有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司最大的股東是華信投資管理有限公司,持有26%的股權。第二大股東是浙江巨化股份有限公司,持有26%的普通股,衢州恒鑫企業管理合夥企業(有限合夥)持有公司股份的約7.3%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of GrandiT
GrandiT的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GrandiT. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有22%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對格蘭迪特有一定影響力。 儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能無法改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 33%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有33%的股權,股權投資公司能夠在塑造企業戰略方面發揮作用,專注於價值創造。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。或者,這些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司擁有該公司14%的股份。深入了解一下可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 26% of GrandiT. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們發現上市公司擁有Grandit的26%。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能存在相關業務利益。他們可能已經進行了分拆。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for GrandiT that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得查看公司的所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正深入了解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Grandit的一個警告信號,您在投資之前應該注意。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。