share_log

Tesla Fails To Justify The Robotaxi Hype With Concrete Figures

Tesla Fails To Justify The Robotaxi Hype With Concrete Figures

特斯拉未能用具體數據證明無人出租車的炒作
Benzinga ·  10/16 03:08

Last week, Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) unveiled its long-awaited robotaxi, the star of its next chapter. The Cybercab was revealed at the massive Warner Bros Studios in Burbank, California, known as Hollywood. Like the Cybertruck, Tesla's robotaxi has a futuristic design, but the "We, Robot" event failed to impress. After the event, Tesla CEO Elon Musk's net worth went down by $15 billion as he holds about 13% of the company's shares, but he remains the world's richest person.

特斯拉公司上週在加州伯班克的華納兄弟影視公司展示了備受期待的專車,是其下一篇章的明星。Cybercab在好萊塢的巨大華納兄弟影城首次亮相。與Cybertruck一樣,特斯拉的專車擁有未來主義設計,但「我們,機器人」活動並未令人印象深刻。活動結束後,特斯拉CEO埃隆·馬斯克的淨資產下降了150億美元,因爲他持有公司約13%的股份,但他仍然是世界上最富有的人。

More Information About The Cybercab

關於Cybercab的更多信息

With production scheduled for some time before 2027, Musk also revealed that the Cybercab, which would compete with rivals including Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL)-owned Waymo, would cost less than $30,000, which is about the same price as its cheaper Model 3 and Model Y. Moreover, the Cybercab has no plug as it would use inductive charging, one for which Tesla does not currently have infrastructure for, raising many concerns about the cost of making this driverless dream actually happen.

按計劃,生產將在2027年之前進行,馬斯克還透露,Cybercab將與包括alphabet inc旗下Waymo在內的競爭對手競爭,其價格將低於30000美元,大約與更便宜的Model 3和Model Y的價格相同。此外,Cybercab不需要插頭,它將使用電感充電,特斯拉目前並沒有爲此提供基礎設施,這引發了許多關於實現這一無人駕駛夢想的成本的擔憂。

However, Musk remains optimistic despite skepticism.

然而,儘管存在懷疑,馬斯克仍然保持樂觀。

After a decade of failing to meet his own deadlines, Musk's prediction that production of the Cybercab would begin some time "before 2027" is seen as questionable. Paul Miller from Research Forrester believes it will be extremely difficult for Tesla to offer a new vehicle at that price within that timeframe, which means Tesla would be making a loss on every vehicle.

特斯拉過去十年來屢屢未能如期交付產品,馬斯克預言Cybercab的生產將於"2027年之前"開始,被視爲存疑。來自Forrester研究的保羅·米勒認爲特斯拉在此期限內以那個價格提供全新車型將會非常困難,這意味着特斯拉將在每輛車上虧損。

The glitzy showcase failed to shake off the feeling that Tesla is losing the race.

華麗的展示未能擺脫特斯拉正在輸掉比賽的感覺。

Thursday was supposed to be the unveiling of Tesla's new chapter, providing a glimpse of its future built on Musk's latest driverless dreams. But with Musk's, history of falling short on promises and Tesla's past of safety issues, there are many concerns around the Cybercab. Adding to the fact that Alphabet is already operating with Waymo, along with other Chinese firms, Tesla is still far from disrupting the landscape. Many have faltered with automated driving technology when it came to figuring out a profitable business model. For example, it took Google quite some time to scale Waymo. On Thursday, humanoid Optimus robots served drinks and the world got a glimpse of Tesla's robotaxi fleet, "Cybercab" and "Robovan", with disappointment in the air. While reasons varied, from not-so-thrilling joyrides in the new vehicles to not-so-self-functioning self-functioning robots and so-on, Tesla failed to impress as it goes up against not only Google and its Waymo, but General Motors (NYSE:GM) and its Cruise autonomous ride-hailing service, as well as Zoox, Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ:AMZN)'s self-driving subsidiary. All in all, the market was probably mostly disappointed because they the dazzling event failed not provide any concrete numbers.

星期四本應是特斯拉新篇章的揭幕,展示了建立在馬斯克最新無人駕駛夢想基礎上的未來前景。但鑑於馬斯克過去承諾兌現不足的歷史和特斯拉以往的安全問題,人們對Cybercab存在許多擔憂。此外,由於Alphabet已經與Waymo合作,還有其他中國公司,特斯拉仍然遠未顛覆現有格局。許多公司在自動駕駛技術方面存在失敗,想要找到盈利業務模式。例如,谷歌花了很長時間才推廣Waymo。星期四,仿人Optimus機器人倒酒,世界看到了特斯拉的頂級出租車車隊,"Cybercab"和"Robovan",空氣中充滿失望。雖然原因各不相同,從新車輛上乏味的乘坐體驗到不怎麼自我運作的自我運作機器人等,特斯拉在與谷歌及其Waymo、通用汽車(紐交所:GM)及其Cruise自動駕駛打車服務以及Zoox、亞馬遜公司(納斯達克:AMZN)的自動駕駛子公司競爭時,並未給業界留下深刻印象。總的來說,市場可能大多感到失望,因爲這次令人眼花繚亂的活動未能提供任何具體數字。

DISCLAIMER: This content is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as investing advice.

免責聲明:本內容僅供參考,不構成任何投資建議。

This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga's reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

本文來自非報酬的外部投稿人。它不代表Benzinga的報道,並且沒有因爲內容或準確性而被編輯。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論