Pinming Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688109) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 17% Drop
Pinming Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688109) Top Holders Are Insiders and They Are Likely Disappointed by the Recent 17% Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Pinming Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Pinming Technology的重要內部持股表明對公司擴張的固有興趣
- 前 4 大股東擁有公司的 55% 股份。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Pinming Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688109), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制品名科技Co.,Ltd.(SHSE:688109),那麼您就必須查看其股東註冊情況。個人內部持股佔54%的比例,在公司中擁有最多的股份。換句話說,該群體將從其對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或損失最多)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥449m.
因此,在市值下跌了44900萬人民幣後,內部人士作爲一個團體承受了最高的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pinming Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關品名科技的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pinming Technology?
機構持股給我們關於品名科技的什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Pinming Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pinming Technology's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
品名科技已經有機構在股權登記簿上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有一定比例的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看品名科技以下的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pinming Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Xujun Mo with 26% of shares outstanding. Hangzhou Lingshunling Investment Management Enterprise (L.P.) is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Jun Li holds about 10% of the company stock. Jun Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對於品名科技,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是莫旭軍,持有公司已發行股份的26%。杭州靈順嶺投資管理企業(有限合夥)是第二大股東,擁有公司普通股的12%,而李軍持有約10%的公司股份。作爲第三大股東的李軍還兼任董事會成員。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Pinming Technology
品名科技的內部人士持股比例超過了一半。這使他們擁有大量的權力。因此,他們在這家價值19億元的公司中持有10億元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能會希望免費發現他們是否一直在買賣。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Pinming Technology Co., Ltd.. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. That means they own CN¥1.1b worth of shares in the CN¥2.1b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部管理人員擁有非名科技有限公司的大部分股權。這意味着他們可以集體爲公司作出決策。這意味着他們在價值21億人民幣的公司中持有11億人民幣的股份。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望免費了解他們是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Pinming Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在非名科技持有25%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策中左右傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 12%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私有公司擁有已發行股份的12%。但是從這個事實本身很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私有公司的股份。有時內部人或其他相關方可以通過一個單獨的私有公司持有公共公司的股份利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Pinming Technology (including 1 which can't be ignored) .
儘管考慮了擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的品名科技的3個警告信號(包括一個不能忽視的)。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。