With a 52% Stake, Nelnet, Inc. (NYSE:NNI) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
With a 52% Stake, Nelnet, Inc. (NYSE:NNI) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Nelnet's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- 24% of Nelnet is held by Institutions
- 內部人似乎對nelnet的增長有着極大的利益,這可以從他們持有的大量股份中看出來
- 總共有5位投資者擁有該公司的52%股權。
- nelnet有24%的股份被機構持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nelnet, Inc. (NYSE:NNI), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着Nelnet,Inc. (NYSE:NNI),了解業務的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到,個別內部人員擁有公司的52%所有權。換句話說,該團體有可能從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或者損失最多)的利益。
So it follows, every decision made by insiders of Nelnet regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.
因此,對於Nelnet內部人士做出的每一個關於公司未來的決定對他們來說都至關重要。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nelnet.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Nelnet不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nelnet?
機構持股告訴我們有關Nelnet的什麼情況?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Nelnet does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nelnet's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Nelnet確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的一大部分股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們很喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Nelnet下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
It looks like hedge funds own 5.2% of Nelnet shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Nelnet's case, its Top Key Executive, Michael Dunlap, is the largest shareholder, holding 25% of shares outstanding. With 9.3% and 6.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Angela Muhleisen and Dan Muhleisen are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Jeffrey Noordhoek, the CEO has 1.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
看起來對沖基金擁有 nelnet 股份的5.2%。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金往往是非常活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內實現價值創造(以及更高的股價)。因爲實際行動勝過空洞的言辭,當內部持有人持有一家公司的重要股份時,我們認爲這是一個好跡象。在 nelnet 的情況下,其首席要員 Michael Dunlap 是最大的股東,持有25%的流通股。 Angela Muhleisen 和 Dan Muhleisen 分別持有9.3%和6.9%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現 CEO Jeffrey Noordhoek 擁有1.5%的股份。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即約52%的公司由前5名股東控制,這表明這些所有者對業務具有重大影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Nelnet
nelnet 內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Nelnet, Inc.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means insiders have a very meaningful US$2.1b stake in this US$4.1b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有超過 Nelnet, Inc. 一半以上的股份。這使得他們有效地控制了該公司。這意味着內部人士在這家價值41億美元的公司中擁有非常有意義的21億美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏查看,以查看這些內部人士是否已經出售了任何股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。雖然持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.5%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有本公司7.5%的股份。單憑這個事實難以得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司持有上市公司的股權。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Nelnet you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的實際股東非常有趣。但要獲得真正的見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。以此爲例:我們發現 Nelnet 存在 1 個警示信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。