Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.'s (NYSE:HOV) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 12% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hovnanian Enterprises implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構在霍夫納尼安的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有着重大影響
- 業務的52%由前14位股東持有
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE:HOV) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
紐交所股票HOV的每位投資者都應意識到最有影響力的股東群體,擁有最大持股比例的是持有57%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團從對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$132m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 201% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週該公司市值增加了13200萬美元,機構投資者的前景看好。投資回報率爲201%,上一年的回報率已經達到了201%,這最近的增長是非常受歡迎的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hovnanian Enterprises, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解霍夫納尼安企業各種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hovnanian Enterprises?
機構持有權告訴我們關於霍夫納尼安企業的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Hovnanian Enterprises does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hovnanian Enterprises' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到霍夫納尼安企業確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在一種「擁擠交易」的風險。如果這樣的交易出現問題,多方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以查看霍夫納尼安企業的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事並不止於此。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hovnanian Enterprises is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Ara Hovnanian is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。霍夫納尼安企業不是由對沖基金擁有的。該公司的首席執行官Ara Hovnanian是持有13%已發行股份的最大股東。爲了背景信息,第二大股東持有大約6.4%的已發行股份,第三大股東持有5.4%的已發行股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 52% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更仔細看我們的所有權數據,前14名股東擁有的股份總和達到52%,暗示沒有任何單一股東持有佔多數。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Hovnanian Enterprises
霍夫納尼安企業的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.3b, and insiders have US$254m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有霍夫納尼安企業相當比例的股權。其市值僅爲13億美元,內部人士名下持有價值25400萬美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這個免費圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hovnanian Enterprises. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有21%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對霍夫納尼安企業具有一定影響力。雖然這種股權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Hovnanian Enterprises (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。比如,投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確定了霍夫納尼安企業存在2個警告信號(至少有1個讓我們感到有些不舒服),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。