share_log

Despite Recent Sales, Bank7 Corp. (NASDAQ:BSVN) Insiders Still Control 56% of the Company

Despite Recent Sales, Bank7 Corp. (NASDAQ:BSVN) Insiders Still Control 56% of the Company

儘管最近有銷售,但Bank7公司(納斯達克股票代碼:BSVN)內部人士仍控制着該公司56%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  10/17 09:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Bank7 implies vested interests in company growth
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • Bank7存在重要內部控制,意味着對公司增長有着切身利益
  • 前4大股東持有該公司股份的53%。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Bank7 Corp. (NASDAQ:BSVN) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Bank7 Corp. (納斯達克:BSVN) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。我們可以看到個人內部持有公司的大部分股份,佔有56%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果股價下跌將損失最大)。

Insiders are at the top of the company's shareholdings despite selling some shares recently. As a result, they were also the biggest winners as market cap hit US$408m last week.

內部人員儘管最近賣出了一些股票,但仍然位居公司股東之首。因此,隨着市值上週達到40800萬美元,他們也成爲了最大的贏家。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Bank7, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Bank7的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:BSVN Ownership Breakdown October 17th 2024
納斯達克BSVN持股比例拆分2024年10月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bank7?

機構持股告訴我們有關bank7的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bank7. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Bank7, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在bank7中持有相當大比例的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查一下bank7過去的收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NasdaqGS:BSVN Earnings and Revenue Growth October 17th 2024
納斯達克納斯達克市場:BSVN收入和收入增長2024年10月17日

Bank7 is not owned by hedge funds. Our data suggests that William Haines, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 19%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Lisa Haines and Julee Thummel, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 15%. Furthermore, CEO Thomas Travis is the owner of 2.6% of the company's shares.

Bank7不是由所有基金類型擁有。我們的數據顯示,William Haines,也是該公司的首席高管,持有19%的股份。當內部人士持有大量公司股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的跡象,因爲這意味着內部人士願意將其財富綁定在公司的未來上。第二和第三大股東分別是Lisa Haines和Julee Thummel,他們名下的股份數量相同,均爲15%。此外,首席執行官Thomas Travis擁有公司股份的2.6%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Bank7

Bank7的內部人員持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Bank7 Corp. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of US$408m, that means they have US$229m worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

Bank7 Corp.的股份超過一半是由內部持有,這給了他們很大的權力。 鑑於它的市值爲40800萬美元,這意味着他們擁有價值22900萬美元的股份。 看到這種投資水平是件好事。 您可以在這裏檢查一下,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bank7. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有22%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Bank7有一定程度的影響力。 雖然這種所有權規模可能還不足以使政策決定朝着他們有利的方向發展,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Bank7 you should know about.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現 Bank7 的 3 個警告信號,您應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論