Helens International Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9869) CEO Bingzhong Xu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 19% Reduction in Holdings Value
Helens International Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9869) CEO Bingzhong Xu, the Company's Largest Shareholder Sees 19% Reduction in Holdings Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Helens International Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 72% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Bingzhong Xu)
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 海倫司(臨時代碼)的重要內部持股表明對公司擴張的固有利益
- 該公司72%股份由單一股東(徐炳忠)持有
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Helens International Holdings Company Limited (HKG:9869), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 72% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解海倫司(臨時代碼)實際控制權的歸屬,了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。我們可以看到,個人內部持有者擁有公司72%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該集團將獲得最大利益(或者如果市場出現下行趨勢,則損失最大)。
As market cap fell to HK$2.6b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市值在上週下跌至26億港元,內部人士將面臨比公司其他股東群體更高的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Helens International Holdings.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於海倫司(臨時代碼)的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Helens International Holdings?
機構持有權益告訴我們關於海倫司(臨時代碼)的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Helens International Holdings. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
機構在海倫司(臨時代碼)中的持股份額非常小。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。如果公司在增長收入,這可能表明它剛剛開始引起這些雄心勃勃的投資者的注意。如果多家機構投資者同時試圖買入一隻股票,很常見看到股價大幅上漲。因此,請查看下面的歷史盈利軌跡,但請記住,未來最爲重要。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Helens International Holdings. With a 72% stake, CEO Bingzhong Xu is the largest shareholder. This essentially means that they have significant control over the outcome or future of the company, which is why insider ownership is usually looked upon favourably by prospective buyers. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.1% and 0.6% of the stock.
我們注意到,對於海倫司(臨時代碼),對沖基金的投資並不重要。首席執行官許炳中持有72%的股份,是最大的股東。這基本上意味着他們對公司的未來或結果具有重大控制權,這就是爲什麼內部持股通常受到潛在買家青睞。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有大約1.1%和0.6%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Helens International Holdings
海倫司(臨時代碼)的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Helens International Holdings Company Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a HK$1.9b stake in this HK$2.6b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有海倫司(臨時代碼)超過一半的股份。這使他們有效地控制着公司。因此,他們在這個26億港元的業務中擁有19億港元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,表明與股東有着強烈的一致性。您可以 點擊此處 查看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響一項政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Helens International Holdings .
我覺得查看一家公司到底由誰擁有非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得深刻的見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意我們與海倫司(臨時代碼)發現的 2個警告信號 。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。