With 62% Ownership in MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 62% Ownership in MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, MGE Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大部分股份,道富銀行(MGE Energy)的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 前14名股東持有該公司業務的50%。
- 最近有內部人員購買。
If you want to know who really controls MGE Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:MGEE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道誰真正控制着道富銀行(納斯達克股票代碼:MGEE),那麼您需要看看其股東名冊的構成。持有最大股份的是機構,佔有62%。換句話說,該機構能夠從對公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或損失最大)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$3.4b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 33% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到34億美元后獲益最多。股東的一年回報率目前爲33%,而上週的收益則錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MGE Energy.
讓我們更近距離地看看不同類型的股東對MGE能源能告訴我們些什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MGE Energy?
機構所有權告訴我們有關MGE能源的信息是什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MGE Energy. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MGE Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在MGE能源中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的聲譽。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在一種「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下方看到MGE能源的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記得故事總是更加複雜。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MGE Energy. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同影響董事會的決定。對於MGE Energy,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股東,持有16%的流通股份。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有普通股的13%,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc.持有公司股份的約4.0%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更仔細的研究表明,前14名股東擁有50%的股權,意味着沒有單一股東持有絕對多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。
Insider Ownership Of MGE Energy
MGE Energy內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of MGE Energy, Inc. in their own names. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$6.5m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士在自己的名下擁有不到MGE Energy, Inc.1%的股份。請記住這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值650萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。至少看到一些內部人士擁有股份總是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆--包括散戶投資者--持有公司38%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌握話語權,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - MGE Energy has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的實際持有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - mge energy有 2個警示標誌 我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。