Should You Be Worried About Ibotta, Inc.'s (NYSE:IBTA) 0.7% Return On Equity?
Should You Be Worried About Ibotta, Inc.'s (NYSE:IBTA) 0.7% Return On Equity?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of Ibotta, Inc. (NYSE:IBTA).
許多投資者仍在學習關於分析股票時可以有用的各種指標。這篇文章是爲那些想要了解淨資產收益率(roe)的人。通過學以致用,我們將研究roe,以更好地了解Ibotta, Inc.(紐交所:IBTA)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
股東權益回報率(roe)是一種關鍵指標,用於評估公司管理層如何有效利用公司資本。更簡單地說,它衡量了公司相對股東權益的盈利能力。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
怎樣計算ROE?
The formula for return on equity is:
權益回報率的計算公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Ibotta is:
因此,根據上述公式,Ibotta的roe爲:
0.7% = US$2.4m ÷ US$360m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.7% = 240萬美元 ÷ 36000萬美元(截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.01 in profit.
『回報』是指過去十二個月的稅後盈利額。另一種理解方式是,對於每1美元的淨資產,公司能夠賺取0.01美元的利潤。
Does Ibotta Have A Good ROE?
Ibotta的roe表現如何?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Ibotta has a lower ROE than the average (15%) in the Media industry classification.
通過將公司的roe與行業平均值進行比較,我們可以快速衡量公司的表現。重要的是,這遠非完美的指標,因爲同一行業分類中的公司存在顯著差異。如果您看下面的圖片,您會發現Ibotta在媒體行業分類中的roe低於平均值(15%)。
That certainly isn't ideal. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Ibotta visit our risks dashboard for free.
這絕對不是理想情況。儘管如此,我們認爲較低的roe仍可能意味着一家公司有機會通過使用槓桿來提高回報,前提是其現有債務水平較低。當一家公司roe較低但債務水平較高時,我們會謹慎對待,因爲涉及的風險太高。要了解我們爲Ibotta確定的3個風險,請免費訪問我們的風險儀表板。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
債務對ROE的影響是怎樣的?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
大多數公司需要從某個地方獲得資金以增加其利潤。這些投資所需的現金可以來自先前年度的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。對於前兩種選項,ROE將反映出這些用於擴張的現金。在後一種情況下,用於擴張的債務將提高回報率,但不會影響總資本。因此,債務利用可以提高ROE,但在像「暴風雨」這樣的情況下也會帶來額外的風險。
Combining Ibotta's Debt And Its 0.7% Return On Equity
結合Ibotta的債務和其0.7%的淨資產回報率
One positive for shareholders is that Ibotta does not have any net debt! So while I find its ROE to be rather low, at least it didn't use debt. At the end of the day, when a company has zero debt, it is in a better position to take future growth opportunities.
對股東來說的一個利好是,Ibotta沒有任何淨債務!所以,雖然我發現它的ROE相對較低,但至少它沒有使用債務。在一天結束時,當一家公司沒有債務時,它更有可能抓住未來的增長機會。
Summary
總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
roe對於比較不同企業的質量很有用。一家能夠在不借債的情況下實現高股東權益投資回報率的公司可以被認爲是高質量的企業。如果兩家公司具有相同的roe,則我通常更喜歡負債更少的那家公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.
但ROE只是一個更大的難題中的一部分,因爲高質量的企業往往以高倍數的收益交易。因此,重要的是要考慮其他因素,例如未來的利潤增長以及未來的投資需求。因此,您可能需要查看分析師對該公司的預測的免費可視化。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好財務狀況的公司 - 具有高股本回報率和低債務的公司,那麼請不要錯過這份有趣公司列表,該列表免費提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。