share_log

The J. M. Smucker Company's (NYSE:SJM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.2% Over Last Week

The J. M. Smucker Company's (NYSE:SJM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.2% Over Last Week

J. M. Smucker公司(紐交所:SJM)的高機構持股率證明了其股票表現出色,上週上漲了4.2%
Simply Wall St ·  10/19 08:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in J. M. Smucker implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構在J. M. Smucker的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響
  • 共有19個投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM)的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。 我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司83%的所有權。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將獲益最多(或在股價下跌時損失最大)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$13b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 12% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

而上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到130億美元后獲益最大。 股東的一年回報率目前爲12%,上週的收益簡直錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of J. M. Smucker.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看J.m. Smucker的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:SJM Ownership Breakdown October 19th 2024
紐交所:SJm所有權拆分2024年10月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About J. M. Smucker?

機構持有權告訴我們什麼關於J. m. Smucker?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

J. M. Smucker already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at J. M. Smucker's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

J.m. Smucker已經有機構在股東註冊表上了。實際上,它們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也有可能錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看一下J.m. Smucker的以下盈利歷史是值得的。當然,真正重要的是未來。

big
NYSE:SJM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 19th 2024
紐交所:SJm股票的2024年10月19日收益和營收增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. J. M. Smucker is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 6.0% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要權力。J. m. Smucker不是由對沖基金擁有。先鋒集團目前是該公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股。黑石集團是第二大股東,擁有7.7%的普通股,而道富全球投資者持有約6.0%的公司股票。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對於股權數據的更深入分析顯示,前19大股東共計持有公司50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東佔多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of J. M. Smucker

J. m. Smucker的內部持股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in The J. M. Smucker Company. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$450m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有J. m. Smucker公司的一些股份。這是一家非常龐大的公司,董事會成員共計擁有價值45000萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部持有人最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over J. M. Smucker. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有13%股權的普通公衆,主要是個人投資者,對J. m. Smucker有一定程度的影響力。儘管擁有這一比例的股權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能並不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that J. M. Smucker is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is significant...

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,J. m. Smucker顯示了2個警示信號,其中1個是顯著的...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論