share_log

In the Wake of Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited's (HKG:1997) Latest HK$3.2b Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited's (HKG:1997) Latest HK$3.2b Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在碧桂園地產投資公司有限公司(HKG:1997)最新的32億港元市值下跌之際,機構持有人可能被迫採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  10/20 21:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Wharf Real Estate Investment's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有大量股權,和記地產投資的股價可能會對他們的交易決策產生影響
  • 總共有2個投資者掌握了該公司52%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited (HKG:1997) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 65% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位和記地產投資有限公司(HKG:1997)的投資者都應該注意最具影響力的股東群體。持有最大股份的群體是擁有65%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(或者在市場下滑時損失最多)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 4.0% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 6.9% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Wharf Real Estate Investment, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到自己的持股價值下跌了4.0%。這組投資者可能特別關注當前的虧損,這使得股東們在一年內的虧損達到了6.9%。"流動性提供者"或機構控制着大筆資金,因此,這類投資者通常在股價波動方面具有很大的影響力。因此,如果下行趨勢持續下去,機構可能面臨出售The Wharf地產投資的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者造成負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Wharf Real Estate Investment.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型股東對The Wharf地產投資的告訴我們什麼。

big
SEHK:1997 Ownership Breakdown October 21st 2024
SEHK:1997所有權拆分2024年10月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wharf Real Estate Investment?

機構持股告訴我們關於The Wharf地產投資的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Wharf Real Estate Investment already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Wharf Real Estate Investment's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

The Wharf地產投資已經有機構出現在股東註冊表中。他們確實擁有公司中相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過股票,並且他們喜歡。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看一下下面The Wharf地產投資的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SEHK:1997 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 21st 2024
SEHK:1997 營收和營業收入增長2024年10月21日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Wharf Real Estate Investment is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Wheelock and Company Limited is the largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.8% of common stock, and The Wharf (Holdings) Limited holds about 4.2% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以集體行使重要影響力。九龍倉地產投資並不是由對沖基金所持有。我們的數據顯示,會德豐公司是最大的股東,持有公司47%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有公司4.8%的普通股,而九龍倉(控股)有限公司持有約4.2%的公司股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Wharf Real Estate Investment

九龍倉地產投資的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own HK$44m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最新的數據顯示,碇捷地產投資有限公司的內部持股人持有少於1%的股份。 但他們可能通過我們尚未發現的公司結構間接持有利益。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部持有大量公司股份將會令人驚訝。儘管他們持股不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員集體持有價值4400萬港元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但值得一提的是,可能值得檢查這些內部持股人是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 33% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Wharf Real Estate Investment. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有33%股權的一般大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對碇捷地產投資具有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決定偏好,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Wharf Real Estate Investment , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下投資風險這個無處不在的幽靈。我們已經確定了和地產投資有關的兩個警示信號,並理解它們應該是你投資過程中的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論