While Institutions Invested in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) Benefited From Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
While Institutions Invested in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) Benefited From Last Week's 5.5% Gain, Retail Investors Stood to Gain the Most
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Cassava Sciences indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 36% of the company
- Insiders own 12% of Cassava Sciences
- 零售投資者在cassava sciences中擁有的相當大比例所有權表明,他們共同在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權
- 前25大股東擁有公司36%的股份
- 內部人員擁有cassava sciences 12%的股份
Every investor in Cassava Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:SAVA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 60% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
cassava sciences, Inc. (納斯達克: SAVA)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東集團。零售投資者持有60%的股份,是公司中持有最多股份的群體。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下滑),這個群體將受益最多(或者損失最大)。
While retail investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$72m market cap gain, institutions too had a 28% share in those profits.
儘管零售投資者是上週市場總市值增長7200萬美元中受益最多的一群,但機構也在這些利潤中佔有28%的份額。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cassava Sciences, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Cassava Sciences不同類型的股東,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cassava Sciences?
機構持股告訴我們關於Cassava Sciences的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cassava Sciences. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cassava Sciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所見,機構投資者在Cassava Sciences中有相當數量的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票並且喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,看一看Cassava Sciences的下面的營收歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cassava Sciences. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 6.7%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.6% and 5.4% of the stock. In addition, we found that Richard Barry, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.
對於cassava sciences,對沖基金持有的股份不多。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,擁有6.7%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約5.6%和5.4%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Richard Barry名下擁有1.0%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Cassava Sciences
cassava sciences的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Cassava Sciences, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$162m stake in this US$1.4b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
內部持有大量cassava sciences股票。看到內部人員在這14億美元的公司中擁有有意義的16200萬美元股份,實在很有趣。多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看最近內部人員交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 60% of Cassava Sciences shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通投資者,主要由個人投資者組成,共同持有cassava sciences 60%的股份。這種所有權規模使得普通投資者擁有一些集體力量。他們可以並且可能會影響對執行薪酬、股利政策和擬議業務收購的決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cassava Sciences better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for Cassava Sciences (3 are a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮在公司中持有股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解Cassava Sciences,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了Cassava Sciences的5個警示信號(其中3個有點令人擔憂!)在您在此投資之前,您應該意識到這一點。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。