Fengzhushou (SZSE:301382) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Fengzhushou (SZSE:301382) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Fengzhushou Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301382) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
由巴菲特的合作伙伴查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理陸立鈴在說到「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受資本永久損失」時毫不掩飾。因此,聰明的資金知道,債務(通常與破產有關)是評估公司風險程度時的一個非常重要因素。我們可以看到,風鑄數億股份有限公司(SZSE:301382)在業務中使用債務。但這種債務是否會讓股東擔憂呢?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務在企業遇到償還困難時可以提供幫助,要麼通過新的資本,要麼通過自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法定義務,股東可能一無所有。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的價格發行股票,從而永久稀釋股東的利益,以穩定其資產負債表。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表了廉價的資本,尤其是當它取代了公司能夠以高回報率重新投資的稀釋時。在考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是考慮其現金和債務的總體情況。
What Is Fengzhushou's Debt?
風鑄數億的債務情況是什麼?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Fengzhushou had debt of CN¥500.5m, up from CN¥370.7m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of CN¥472.4m, its net debt is less, at about CN¥28.1m.
下面的圖片,您可以點擊以獲取更詳細信息,顯示截至2024年6月,風鑄數億的債務爲50050萬人民幣,比一年前的37070萬人民幣增加。然而,由於它擁有47240萬人民幣的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲2810萬人民幣。
A Look At Fengzhushou's Liabilities
查看風駐守的負債情況
According to the last reported balance sheet, Fengzhushou had liabilities of CN¥558.3m due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥88.1m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥472.4m as well as receivables valued at CN¥705.3m due within 12 months. So it can boast CN¥531.3m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,風駐守有因爲12個月內到期的負債爲人民幣55830萬,以及12個月後到期的負債爲人民幣8810萬。 抵消這些義務,它擁有人民幣47240萬的現金,以及價值人民幣70530萬的應收款項,這些款項在12個月內到期。 因此,風駐守擁有人民幣53130萬更多的流動資產,比總負債多。
This short term liquidity is a sign that Fengzhushou could probably pay off its debt with ease, as its balance sheet is far from stretched. But either way, Fengzhushou has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
這種短期流動性表明風駐守很可能能夠輕鬆償還債務,因爲其資產負債表遠非過於緊張。 但無論如何,風駐守幾乎沒有淨債務,因此可以說它沒有沉重的債務負擔!
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。
Fengzhushou's net debt is only 0.16 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 160 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, Fengzhushou grew its EBIT by 4.0% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is Fengzhushou's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
風駐守的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.16倍。其EBIt覆蓋其利息支出高達160倍。 因此,你可以說它受債務威脅並不比大象受到老鼠威脅更多。 幸運的是,風駐守在過去一年中將其EBIt增長了4.0%,使得債務負擔看起來更易管理。 毫無疑問,我們大部分關於債務的信息都來自資產負債表。 但正是風駐守的盈利將影響資產負債表未來的表現。 因此,如果您希望了解更多關於其盈利的信息,不妨查看一下其長期盈利趨勢圖。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Fengzhushou saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,一個企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不足以償還。 因此,我們始終檢查有多少EBIt轉化爲自由現金流。 過去三年,風駐守的自由現金流總體呈現出大幅負增長。 儘管這可能是因爲爲了增長而進行的支出,但這確實使債務更加風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
Based on what we've seen Fengzhushou is not finding it easy, given its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow, but the other factors we considered give us cause to be optimistic. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. Considering this range of data points, we think Fengzhushou is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Fengzhushou that you should be aware of.
根據我們所看到的,鳳竹獸在將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流方面並不容易,但我們考慮的其他因素讓我們有理由樂觀。毫無疑問,它用EBIt支付利息費用的能力相當強。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲鳳竹獸在管理其債務水平方面處於一個良好的位置。但需要提醒的是:我們認爲債務水平足夠高,需要進行持續監測。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們發現鳳竹獸存在2個警告信號,您應該注意。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。