share_log

With 67% Ownership, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE:BIPC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 67% Ownership, Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE:BIPC) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有67%股權,brookfield infrastructure公司(紐交所:BIPC)得到了強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  10/22 09:43

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Brookfield Infrastructure's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 14 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 由於機構大量持有Brookfield Infrastructure的股票,其股票價格可能受到機構交易決策的影響。
  • 前14大股東擁有該公司的51%。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE:BIPC) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 67% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下Brookfield Infrastructure公司(紐交所:BIPC)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。 擁有該公司絕大部分股份,準確來說約67%的是機構。 也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者出現下跌)時,該集團將獲益最多。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Brookfield Infrastructure.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於 brookfield infrastructure 的信息。

big
NYSE:BIPC Ownership Breakdown October 22nd 2024
紐交所:BIPC 所有權拆分 2024年10月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brookfield Infrastructure?

機構持股說明Brookfield Infrastructure的某些可信度。但最好注意不要過多依賴於機構投資者的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們處於「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Brookfield Infrastructure的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是更爲豐富。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Brookfield Infrastructure already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Brookfield Infrastructure, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

brookfield infrastructure 已經在股東名冊上持有機構。事實上,他們持有公司的相當比例。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視過這支股票,並且他們看好。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查 brookfield infrastructure 的過去收入軌跡(如下)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:BIPC Earnings and Revenue Growth October 22nd 2024
紐交所:BIPC2024年10月22日營收和收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Brookfield Infrastructure. Our data shows that Brookfield Corporation is the largest shareholder with 9.1% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.2% and 7.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%股份,因此他們可能強烈影響董事會決策。對布魯克菲爾德基礎設施來說,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,布魯克菲爾德公司是最大的股東,持有9.1%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的8.2%和7.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前14名股東持有該公司的51%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對該公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Brookfield Infrastructure

Brookfield Infrastructure內部股權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$382k worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有的Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation股份不到1%。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可能擁有公司的重要利益,而不擁有很大比例的利益。在這種情況下,他們擁有大約38.2萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。 您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Brookfield Infrastructure. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

作爲擁有25%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Brookfield Infrastructure有一定影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 7.8% of Brookfield Infrastructure. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司擁有brookfield infrastructure 7.8%的股份。這可能是戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關業務利益。他們可能已經分拆。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Brookfield Infrastructure better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Brookfield Infrastructure (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到擁有一家公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解brookfield infrastructure,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們爲brookfield infrastructure發現了4個警告信號(1個不容忽視!)在您投資之前,請務必注意這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論