Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) Surges 11%; Retail Investors Who Own 37% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) Surges 11%; Retail Investors Who Own 37% Shares Profited Along With Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Keymed Biosciences' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 9 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 30% of Keymed Biosciences is held by Institutions
- Keymed Biosciences的大量零售投資者所有權表明關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響
- 前9大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
- Keymed Biosciences的30%股份由機構持有
A look at the shareholders of Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 37% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下Keymed Biosciences Inc. (HKG:2162)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。以37%的股份,零售投資者擁有該公司中的最多股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 11% price gain, institutions also received a 30% cut.
儘管零售投資者是上週股價上漲11%後獲益最多的群體,但機構也獲得了30%的收入。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Keymed Biosciences.
在下面的圖表中,我們將焦點放在Keymed Biosciences的不同持股群體上。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Keymed Biosciences?
機構持股告訴我們什麼與Keymed Biosciences有關?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Keymed Biosciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Keymed Biosciences, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Keymed Biosciences擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某隻股票,導致股價暴跌,這並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Keymed Biosciences的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Keymed Biosciences. The company's largest shareholder is Moonshot Holdings Limited, with ownership of 28%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.0% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對科肽生物科技股票,對沖基金持股不多。該公司最大的股東是Moonshot Holdings Limited,持有28%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的5.0%和4.9%。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Keymed Biosciences
科肽生物科技的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.
我們無法證實董事會成員是否個人持有股份。董事會成員沒有至少持有一些股份是不尋常的,所以我們的數據可能有誤。下一步是查看這篇有關股票買入和賣出的免費總結,以進一步了解該問題。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Keymed Biosciences. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有37%股權的廣大公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在Keymed Biosciences擁有一定程度的影響力。 儘管擁有的股權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 28%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們可以看到,私有公司持有股份總數的 28%。從單獨這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此了解擁有這些私有公司的人是值得的。有時,公司內部人員或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私有公司持有上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Keymed Biosciences .
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在Keymed Biosciences發現的1個警示信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。