share_log

Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688127) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Yunming Xu, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 17% Last Week

Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688127) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Yunming Xu, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 17% Last Week

藍特光學股份有限公司(SHSE:688127)最看好的內幕人士是CEO徐雲明,他們的持股價值上週上漲了17%
Simply Wall St ·  10/24 08:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Zhejiang Lante Optics implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 2 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • 14% of Zhejiang Lante Optics is held by Institutions
  • 藍特光學存在重要的內部控制,意味着對公司增長有着牢固的利益
  • 公司前兩名股東共持有該公司51%的股份。
  • 14%的藍特光學股份由機構持有

If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688127), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着藍特光學股份有限公司(SHSE:688127),那麼您需要查看其股東登記冊的構成。持有公司股份最多的集團,確切地說大約佔55%,是獨立內部持股人。換句話說,該集團將最有可能(或最有可能)從他們投資公司中獲益。

Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥1.3b last week.

顯然,在上週公司市值增加1300000000人民幣後,內部人受益最多。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhejiang Lante Optics, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究藍特光學每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:688127 Ownership Breakdown October 24th 2024
SHSE:688127於2024年10月24日的所有權分佈情況

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Lante Optics?

機構持有權告訴我們有關藍特光學的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zhejiang Lante Optics. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Lante Optics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在藍特光學擁有相當大比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售某隻股票,那麼股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看藍特光學的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

big
SHSE:688127 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 24th 2024
SHSE:688127於2024年10月24日的收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zhejiang Lante Optics. The company's CEO Yunming Xu is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. Fangli Wang is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Jiaxing Lantuo Equity Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 2.1% of the company stock.

我們注意到對藍特光學的對沖基金沒有持有意義重大投資。該公司的CEO徐雲明是最大的股東,持有38%的股份。王方麗是第二大股東,持有14%的普通股,嘉興蘭拓股權投資合夥企業(有限合夥)持有該公司約2.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Lante Optics

藍特光學的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Zhejiang Lante Optics Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. Insiders own CN¥5.1b worth of shares in the CN¥9.2b company. That's extraordinary! Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

看起來內部持有者擁有超過一半的藍特光學股份。 這使他們擁有很大的權力。 內部持有價值51億人民幣的股份,佔92億人民幣公司的股份總額。 這真是不同尋常! 大多數人會高興看到董事會和他們一起投資。 您可能希望了解他們是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zhejiang Lante Optics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有30%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對藍特光學有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右決策者的決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Zhejiang Lante Optics , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮投資風險這個始終存在的威脅。我們已經找到了藍特光學的兩個警示信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論