Private Companies Are CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥551m Last Week
Private Companies Are CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥551m Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over CITIC Niya Wine by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Insider ownership in CITIC Niya Wine is 12%
- 私人公司對中信尼雅葡萄酒的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
- 公司前2名股東持有56%的股份
- 中信尼雅葡萄酒的內部持股比例爲12%
A look at the shareholders of CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600084) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下中信尼雅葡萄酒股份有限公司(SHSE:600084)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最有權力。我們可以看到,私人公司擁有該公司47%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 9.7% gain.
因此,私人公司是上週收益9.7%的最大受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CITIC Niya Wine, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解中信尼雅酒的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CITIC Niya Wine?
機構持股缺失對中信尼雅酒有何影響?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. CITIC Niya Wine's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
可能有各種原因解釋爲何沒有機構持有公司股份。通常,規模較小、新上市的公司不會引起基金經理們的注意,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的頭寸。也有可能基金經理不持有股票是因爲他們並不認爲股票表現會好。中信尼雅酒的收入和營業收入歷史數據(如下)可能並沒有吸引機構投資者--或者他們可能只是並沒有仔細研究過該業務。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CITIC Niya Wine. Our data shows that CITIC Guoan Group Corporation is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 1.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對中信尼雅酒沒有有意義的機構投資。我們的數據顯示,中信國安集團股份有限公司是最大的股東,持有45%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的11%和1.8%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況
Insider Ownership Of CITIC Niya Wine
中信尼雅酒內部持有股份
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥735m stake in this CN¥6.2b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部持有中信尼雅酒業股份有限公司的股份。 內部人士在這家總市值62億元的公司中持有73500萬人民幣的股權。 我們會說這顯示了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小; 一些內部人士可能創立了這家企業。 您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CITIC Niya Wine. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆擁有41%的持股,主要由個人投資者組成,對中信尼雅酒業有一定的影響力。 儘管這個團體不能確定決策,但它確實可以對公司的經營產生真正的影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 47%, of the CITIC Niya Wine stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
中信尼雅酒的47%股份似乎是由私人公司持有的。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過在私人公司持有股份來對公共公司產生興趣,而不是以個人身份擁有。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這是值得進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - CITIC Niya Wine has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,要冒風險 - 中信尼雅酒有1個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。