Does Verint Systems (NASDAQ:VRNT) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Verint Systems (NASDAQ:VRNT) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Verint Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:VRNT) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
大衛·伊本說得很好,他說:「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。」因此,聰明的投資者知道,債務是破產時通常涉及的一個非常重要因素,當您評估公司風險時。值得注意的是,verint系統公司(納斯達克:VRNT)確實存在債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務帶來了多大風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
債務可以幫助業務,直到業務有付不起的麻煩,或者通過新的資本或自由現金流來解決。資本主義的重要組成部分是「創造性破壞」過程,在這個過程中,銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。雖然這不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司永久地稀釋股東,因爲借款人強迫他們以困境價格籌集資本。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,特別是對於資本密集型企業。在考慮業務使用多少債務時,首先要做的是看看它的現金和債務。
How Much Debt Does Verint Systems Carry?
verint系統承擔了多少債務?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Verint Systems had US$411.7m in debt in July 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$208.6m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$203.1m.
下面的圖表(點擊可放大細節)顯示,verint系統於2024年7月有41170萬美元的債務,與前一年相當。然而,它有20860萬美元的現金來抵消這筆債務,導致淨債務約爲20310萬美元。
A Look At Verint Systems' Liabilities
關注verint系統的負債
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Verint Systems had liabilities of US$364.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$544.5m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$208.6m and US$234.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$465.2m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
從最近的資產負債表中,我們可以看到verint系統的短期負債爲36410萬元美元,長期負債爲54450萬元美元。另一方面,其現金爲20860萬元美元,一年內應收賬款爲23480萬元美元。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合高出46520萬元美元。
This deficit isn't so bad because Verint Systems is worth US$1.36b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
這個赤字並不算太糟糕,因爲verint系統價值13.6億美元,因此如果有必要,可能會籌集足夠的資金來完善其資產負債表。然而,仍值得密切關注其償還債務的能力。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
Verint Systems has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.4. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 32.7 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. In addition to that, we're happy to report that Verint Systems has boosted its EBIT by 87%, thus reducing the spectre of future debt repayments. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Verint Systems's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
verint系統的淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率僅爲1.4。其EBIt覆蓋利息費用高達32.7倍。因此,可以說它對債務的威脅不亞於大象對老鼠。此外,我們很高興地宣佈,verint系統將其EBIt提高了87%,從而降低了未來債務償還的風險。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解大部分債務信息。但更重要的是,未來的收入,而不是其他任何東西,將決定verint系統維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Verint Systems actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.
但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們必須明確看看EBIt是否導致相應的自由現金流。令股東高興的是,過去三年,verint系統實際產生的自由現金流比EBIt還要多。這種強勁的現金生成方式讓我們感覺像是看到了穿蜜蜂服的小狗一樣溫暖。
Our View
我們的觀點
The good news is that Verint Systems's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Zooming out, Verint Systems seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Verint Systems that you should be aware of before investing here.
好消息是,verint系統表現出能夠用其EBIt覆蓋利息支出的能力,就像一隻毛絨絨的小狗讓幼兒感到高興一樣。而且好消息並不止於此,它將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的表現也支持這一印象!總的來看,verint系統似乎相當合理地利用債務;這也得到了我們的認可。畢竟,明智的槓桿可以提高股本回報率。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要集中關注的區域。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。例如,我們發現了verint系統的1個警示標誌,您在投資這裏之前應該意識到。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。