Institutional Owners May Ignore ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CNOB) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CNOB) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies ConnectOne Bancorp's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構持有的股份比例極高意味着康涅狄格聯合銀行的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 共有14名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,佔有50%的所有權。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:CNOB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 70% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着康涅狄格聯合銀行(NASDAQ:CNOB),重要的是了解企業的所有權結構。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司70%的股權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上升空間(或下降風險)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$942m last week. However, the 62% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
公司市值上週下跌至94200萬美元后,機構投資者是受影響最嚴重的群體。不過,股東們獲得的62%的一年回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,我們可以假設他們將警惕未來的風險。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of ConnectOne Bancorp.
在下面的圖表中,我們將聚焦於ConnectOne Bancorp的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ConnectOne Bancorp?
機構所有權對ConnectOne Bancorp告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
ConnectOne Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ConnectOne Bancorp's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
ConnectOne Bancorp已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯誤。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們進行『人群工作』的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看ConnectOne Bancorp的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事並不僅限於此。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. ConnectOne Bancorp is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.0% and 5.9% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sorrentino is the owner of 2.0% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們共同能夠行使重大權力。ConnectOne Bancorp不是由對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有公司11%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.0%和5.9%的股票。此外,CEO Frank Sorrentino擁有公司股份的2.0%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更仔細的研究表明,前14名股東擁有50%的股權,意味着沒有單一股東持有絕對多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of ConnectOne Bancorp
ConnectOne Bancorp的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$63m worth of stock in the US$942m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,內部人員在ConnectOne Bancorp,Inc.擁有股份。在他們自己的名下,內部人員在這家市值94200萬美元的公司中擁有6300萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出了一些對齊。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in ConnectOne Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有ConnectOne Bancorp的24%股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右某一項政策決定傾向他們方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ConnectOne Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮公司股東中的不同群體。但要更好地了解ConnectOne Bancorp,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。