Digital Domain Holdings Limited (HKG:547) Insiders Have Recently Purchased Stock and Their Bets Paid off Last Week as Company Hit HK$3.7b Market Cap
Digital Domain Holdings Limited (HKG:547) Insiders Have Recently Purchased Stock and Their Bets Paid off Last Week as Company Hit HK$3.7b Market Cap
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Digital Domain Holdings implies vested interests in company growth
- 55% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Insiders have been buying lately
- 數字王國控股的重要內部控制意味着對公司增長的利益
- 公司55%的股份由前6大股東持有
- 內部人員最近一直在買入。
A look at the shareholders of Digital Domain Holdings Limited (HKG:547) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
觀察數字王國控股有限公司(HKG:547)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最爲強大。持有公司最多股份的集團,準確地說大約佔了公司的49%,就是個人內部人士。換句話說,這個集團從他們對公司的投資中可以得到(或失去)最多。
Having purchased shares recently, insiders must be glad after market cap hit HK$3.7b last week.
最近購買了股票的內部人士在市值上週達到37億港幣後一定很高興。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Digital Domain Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看數字王國控股的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Digital Domain Holdings?
數字王國控股缺乏機構持股對我們有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。
There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Digital Domain Holdings, for yourself, below.
公司在股東名冊中沒有任何機構的原因有很多。 如果流動性(每天交易的股票數量)較低,機構可能很難買入大量股票。 如果公司沒有需要籌集資金,機構可能缺乏開倉的機會。 還有可能是基金經理不持有該股票,因爲他們並不確信其表現會好。 機構投資者可能並不認爲公司的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能涉及其他因素。 您可以在下面自己查看數字王國控股的過去營業收入表現。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Digital Domain Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is ADATA Technology Co., Ltd., with ownership of 19%. With 9.5% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hoi See Song and Poly Culture Group Corporation Limited are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Ang Seah, the CEO has 0.6% of the shares allocated to their name.
對數字王國控股有限公司,對沖基金持股不多。公司最大的股東是威剛科技有限公司,持有19%。分別持有流通股的9.5%和6.7%,Hoi See Song和保利文化集團股份有限公司分別是第二和第三大股東。此外,我們發現總裁Ang Seah名下擁有0.6%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Digital Domain Holdings
數字王國控股公司內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Digital Domain Holdings Limited. Insiders own HK$1.8b worth of shares in the HK$3.7b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
數字王國控股有限公司中,內部人士擁有相當比例的股份。內部人士在37億港元的公司中擁有18億港元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Digital Domain Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有23%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對數字王國控股有一定程度的影響力。儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 8.2%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的8.2%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人士可能通過持有私人公司的股份而對公共公司產生興趣,而不是作爲個人。雖然很難得出任何一般性結論,但這值得進一步研究。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 19% of Digital Domain Holdings stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
公共公司目前擁有數字王國控股股份的19%。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性持股。這些企業可能是相似的,或者合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Digital Domain Holdings (at least 1 which is a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體是很值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。比如,考慮投資風險這個難以消除的威脅。我們已經識別出數字王國控股存在的2個警示信號(至少有1個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。