Quanex Building Products Corporation's (NYSE:NX) Institutional Investors Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Quanex Building Products Corporation's (NYSE:NX) Institutional Investors Lost 4.1% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Quanex Building Products' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 高機構所有權意味着Quanex Building Products的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 前8名股東擁有公司52%的股份
- 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
If you want to know who really controls Quanex Building Products Corporation (NYSE:NX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Quanex建築產品公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NX),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲79%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$59m last week. Still, the 13% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
上週該公司的市值下降了5900萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。儘管如此,13%的年度漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體虧損。但是他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Quanex Building Products, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Quanex建築產品的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Quanex Building Products?
關於Quanex建築產品,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。
Quanex Building Products already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Quanex Building Products, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Quanex建築產品公司已經在股票登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看Quanex建築產品過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.8% of Quanex Building Products. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.8% and 7.9% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有Quanex建築產品9.8%的股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是貝萊德公司,其已發行股份的13%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.8%和7.9%的股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Quanex Building Products
Quanex 建築產品的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our information suggests that Quanex Building Products Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息表明,Quanex建築產品公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1100萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一部分內部所有權總是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Quanex Building Products is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,Quanex建築產品在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該知道...
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。