Impressive Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Pamica Technology (SZSE:001359)
Impressive Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For Pamica Technology (SZSE:001359)
Unsurprisingly, Pamica Technology Corporation's (SZSE:001359) stock price was strong on the back of its healthy earnings report. We did some analysis and think that investors are missing some details hidden beneath the profit numbers.
毫不奇怪,Pamica 科技股份有限公司(SZSE:001359)的股價在其健康業績的支撐下表現強勁。我們進行了一些分析,認爲投資者忽略了獲利數字背後隱藏的一些細節。
Examining Cashflow Against Pamica Technology's Earnings
審視 Pamica 科技的盈利與現金流
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.
衡量公司將其利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的一個重要財務比率是應計比率。 應計比率將FCF從給定時期的利潤中減去,並將結果除以公司在該期間的平均運營資產。 您可以將非自由現金流獲利比率視爲從現金流中提取的應計比率。
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
因此,負應計比率對公司是有益的,而正應計比率則是不利的。這並不是說我們應該擔心正應計比率,但值得注意的是應計比率相當高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,高應計比率通常是短期利潤的不良跡象。
Pamica Technology has an accrual ratio of 0.22 for the year to September 2024. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, which is hardly a good thing. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥205.6m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥8.5m in the last year. We saw that FCF was CN¥75m a year ago though, so Pamica Technology has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past.
截至2024年9月,Pamica 科技的應計比例爲0.22。因此,我們知道它的自由現金流遠低於其核定利潤,這並不是一件好事。儘管報告顯示利潤爲20560萬元人民幣,但查看自由現金流表明,它實際上在過去一年中虧損了850萬元人民幣。我們看到一年前 FCF 爲7500萬元人民幣,所以 Pamica 科技至少過去能夠產生正面的自由現金流。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
Our Take On Pamica Technology's Profit Performance
我們對 Pamica 科技的盈利表現進行了分析
Pamica Technology didn't convert much of its profit to free cash flow in the last year, which some investors may consider rather suboptimal. Because of this, we think that it may be that Pamica Technology's statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. Nonetheless, it's still worth noting that its earnings per share have grown at 18% over the last three years. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing Pamica Technology at this point in time. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Pamica Technology you should be mindful of and 1 of these bad boys is significant.
Pamica 科技在過去一年中將其利潤轉化爲自由現金流的比例並不高,一些投資者可能認爲這相當不理想。 因此,我們認爲,Pamica 科技的法定利潤可能優於其潛在盈利能力。 儘管如此,仍然值得注意的是,其每股收益在過去三年中增長了 18%。 最終,如果您想全面了解該公司,不僅僅要考慮以上因素,還要考慮更多方面。 因此,儘管盈利質量很重要,但目前同樣重要的是考慮Pamica 科技面臨的風險。 舉例說明:我們發現了2個Pamica 科技的警示信號,您應該注意其中的1 個是重要的。
This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Pamica Technology's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.
本筆註釋僅關注了揭示 Pamica 科技盈利性質的單一因素。 但如果您有能力聚焦到細枝末節上,就會發現更多內容。 一些人認爲高股本回報率是一個高質量業務的好跡象。 因此,您可能希望查看這個擁有高股本回報率的公司的免費集合,或者這些持有高內部人員所有權的股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。