Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 4.2% Decrease
Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 4.2% Decrease
Key Insights
主要見解
- Jushri Technologies' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
- Institutions own 39% of Jushri Technologies
- 上海瀚訊科技的零售投資者佔有權重大,表明重要決策受到更廣大公衆股東的影響
- 前15名股東持有該公司50%的業務。
- 機構擁有上海瀚訊科技39%的股份
Every investor in Jushri Technologies, INC. (SZSE:300762) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
上海瀚訊科技,INC.(SZSE:300762)的每位投資者都應意識到最有影響力的股東群體。擁有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,約爲44%,是零售投資者。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下滑,將損失最多)。
Following a 4.2% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 39% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌了4.2%後,零售投資者遭受了最大損失,但佔有39%股份的機構也受到了打擊。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Jushri Technologies.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於上海瀚訊不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jushri Technologies?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於Jushri Technologies?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Jushri Technologies already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jushri Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
上海瀚訊已經有機構出現在股東註冊中。事實上,他們在公司擁有相當大的持股。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能有錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,導致股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查上海瀚訊的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jushri Technologies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Shuangyou Information Technology Co., Ltd. with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在上海瀚訊持有的股份不多。根據我們的數據,最大股東是上海雙友信息技術有限公司,持有流通股的18%。第二大股東持有約8.6%的流通股,第三大股東持有約4.2%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Jushri Technologies
Jushri Technologies內部股權情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.
我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
大衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司44%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管佔有率相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不能改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 18%, of the Jushri Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私營公司擁有上海瀚訊18%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私營公司股份而非以個人身份持有公共公司股份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但它值得作爲進一步研究的領域加以注意。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Jushri Technologies has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,要冒的風險 - 上海瀚訊存在 1 個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。