share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) Gained 7.8%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有Coastal Financial Corporation(納斯達克:建設銀行)54%股份的個人投資者獲利7.8%,機構也獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  10/29 20:55

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Coastal Financial by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 個人投資者對Coastal Financial的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前25名股東擁有公司45%的股份
  • 業內人士最近一直在拋售

A look at the shareholders of Coastal Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CCB) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看海岸金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CCB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲54%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$787m last week, while institutions who own 28% also benefitted.

上週市值觸及7.87億美元后,個人投資者漲幅最大,而持有28%的機構也從中受益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Coastal Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Coastal Financial的每種類型的所有者。

big
NasdaqGS:CCB Ownership Breakdown October 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年10月29日建行所有權明細

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Coastal Financial?

關於沿海金融,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

We can see that Coastal Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Coastal Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Coastal Financial確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看沿海金融的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:CCB Earnings and Revenue Growth October 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:建行收益和收入增長 2024 年 10 月 29 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Coastal Financial. Steven Hovde is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 4.6% of the stock. In addition, we found that Eric Sprink, the CEO has 1.0% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Coastal Financial進行有意義的投資。史蒂芬·霍夫德目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的13%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.3%和4.6%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官埃裏克·斯普林克以其名義分配了1.0%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25名股東共同控制的公司股份不到一半,這意味着該公司的股票分佈廣泛,沒有占主導地位的股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Coastal Financial

海岸金融的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Coastal Financial Corporation. Insiders have a US$145m stake in this US$787m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有海岸金融公司合理比例的股份。業內人士在這筆7.87億美元的業務中持有1.45億美元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 54% of Coastal Financial shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公衆主要由個人投資者組成,共持有Coastal Financial54%的股份。有了這麼多的所有權,散戶投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策中共同發揮作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他們還可以對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併行使投票權。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Coastal Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Coastal Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解海岸金融,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Coastal Financial確定了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定這家企業所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師是否預測了更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論