share_log

The Recent CN¥445m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Shanghai Luoman Technologies Inc. (SHSE:605289)

The Recent CN¥445m Market Cap Decrease Is Likely to Have Disappointed Insiders Invested in Shanghai Luoman Technologies Inc. (SHSE:605289)

最近人民幣44500萬市值下降可能讓投資於上海羅曼科技股份有限公司(SHSE:605289)的內部投資者感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/30 08:45

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significant insider control over Shanghai Luoman Technologies implies vested interests in company growth
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Shanghai Luoman Technologies is 23%
  • 上海羅曼科技股權受到重要內部控制,意味着對公司增長有着既定利益
  • 54%的業務由前五大股東持有。
  • 上海羅曼科技的機構持股比例爲23%

If you want to know who really controls Shanghai Luoman Technologies Inc. (SHSE:605289), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 30% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着上海羅曼科技有限公司(SHSE:605289),那麼你需要查看其股東登記冊的構成。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔30%,事實上,是個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在上週股價下跌13%之後,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Luoman Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解上海洛曼科技每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:605289 Ownership Breakdown October 30th 2024
上證所:605289 所有權分佈 2024年10月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Luoman Technologies?

機構持股告訴我們有關上海洛曼科技的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Luoman Technologies. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Luoman Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在上海羅曼科技中擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一些信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構共同持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會搶着快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到上海羅曼科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事的內容總是更多。

big
SHSE:605289 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 30th 2024
SHSE:605289 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年10月30日

Shanghai Luoman Technologies is not owned by hedge funds. Jianming Sun is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Kaijun Sun, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

上海羅曼科技不被對沖基金持有。 孫建明目前是最大的股東,持有18%的股份。 作爲參考,第二大股東持有約17%的股份,第三大股東持有7.2%的股份。 第三大股東孫凱軍同時擔任董事會主席。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了讓我們的研究更加有趣,我們發現前5大股東控制了公司超過一半的股份,這意味着這一群體在公司的決策中具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構持股是一種評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究同樣可以達到此目的。對該股票的分析師覆蓋率略低,但不多。因此它有增加更多覆蓋機會。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Luoman Technologies

上海羅曼科技的內部持股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shanghai Luoman Technologies Inc.. Insiders have a CN¥875m stake in this CN¥2.9b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有上海羅曼科技有限公司合理比例的股份。內部人士在這家29億人民幣的企業中持有87500萬人民幣的股份。看到內部人士如此投入於業務是件好事。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in Shanghai Luoman Technologies. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有上海羅曼科技24%的股份。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 23%, of the Shanghai Luoman Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私營公司擁有上海Luoman Technologies股份的23%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員可能通過持有私營公司的股份而對上市公司產生興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Luoman Technologies you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他因素更加重要。 舉個例子:我們發現了一個您應該注意的上海羅曼科技的警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論