Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Action Education Technology CO.,LTD. (SHSE:605098) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥517m Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Shanghai Action Education Technology CO.,LTD. (SHSE:605098) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥517m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 33% of Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD is held by insiders
- 私人公司對上海行動教育科技有限公司的重要控制意味着普通公衆更有權利影響管理和治理相關決策
- 共有2位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
- 上海行動教育科技有限公司的33%股份由內部持有
If you want to know who really controls Shanghai Action Education Technology CO.,LTD. (SHSE:605098), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 34% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着上海行動教育科技有限公司(SHSE:605098),那麼您需要看看其股東名冊的構成。 持有最大股份的是私人公司,佔34%的所有權。 這意味着如果股票上漲(或者如果出現下滑)這個團體將受益最多(或者損失最大)。
While the holdings of private companies took a hit after last week's 11% price drop, insiders with their 33% also suffered.
上週股價下跌11%後,私人公司的持有股份受到了打擊,而持有33%的內部人員也遭受了損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型股東對上海行動教育科技有限公司能告訴我們什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD?
機構持股告訴我們關於上海行動教育科技有限公司的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在上海行動教育科技有限公司中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經審視過股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的上海行動教育科技有限公司的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Jian Li with 31% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 19% and 10% of the stock.
我們注意到對沖基金在上海高鐵教育科技有限公司沒有實質性投資,根據我們的數據,最大的股東是CEO建立,持有31%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約19%和10%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
股東登記冊的更詳細研究向我們展示了前兩大股東在公司中擁有相當數量的股份,佔他們50%的股份
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD
上海高鐵教育科技有限公司內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shanghai Action Education Technology CO.,LTD.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.2b, and insiders have CN¥1.4b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在上海學而思教育科技有限公司持有大量股份。其市值僅爲42億元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有14億元人民幣的股份。看到內部人員如此投入業務是很棒的。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在上海學而思教育科技有限公司持有12%的股份。儘管這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 34%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人企業擁有已發行股份的34%。 私人企業可能是關聯方。 有時,內部人員通過控股私有公司而對一家上市公司產生利益,而不是以個人身份控股。 雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意的是進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Action Education TechnologyLTD you should know about.
考慮不同股東群體是值得的。但要更好地了解上海艾移行教育科技有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮風險,每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了上海艾移行教育科技有限公司的一個警示標誌,您應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。