share_log

The Three-year Loss for Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

The Three-year Loss for Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) Shareholders Likely Driven by Its Shrinking Earnings

中央花園與寵物(納斯達克:CENT)股東三年來的虧損可能是由其萎縮的盈利所驅動
Simply Wall St ·  10/30 07:31

As an investor its worth striving to ensure your overall portfolio beats the market average. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. We regret to report that long term Central Garden & Pet Company (NASDAQ:CENT) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 35% in three years, versus a market return of about 20%. Furthermore, it's down 13% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders.

作爲投資者,努力確保您的整體投資組合擊敗市場平均水平是值得的。但幾乎可以肯定,有時您會買入表現不及市場平均水平的股票。很遺憾的是,長揸Central Garden & Pet Company(納斯達克:CENT)的股東們有過這樣的經歷,股價在三年內下跌了35%,而市場回報率約爲20%。此外,股價在大約一個季度內下跌了13%。這對持有者來說並不令人愉快。

On a more encouraging note the company has added US$76m to its market cap in just the last 7 days, so let's see if we can determine what's driven the three-year loss for shareholders.

更令人鼓舞的是,這家公司在過去7天內市值增加了7600萬美元,讓我們看看能否判斷是什麼導致了股東們三年的損失。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否認的是,市場有時是高效的,但價格並不總是反映潛在的商業表現。一個不完美但簡單的方法來考慮公司市場感知如何改變是比較每股收益(EPS)變化和股價變動。

During the three years that the share price fell, Central Garden & Pet's earnings per share (EPS) dropped by 12% each year. This change in EPS is reasonably close to the 13% average annual decrease in the share price. That suggests that the market sentiment around the company hasn't changed much over that time, despite the disappointment. Rather, the share price has approximately tracked EPS growth.

在股價下跌的三年中,Central Garden & Pet的每股收益(EPS)每年下降了12%。這種EPS的變化與股價每年下跌13%的平均值相當接近。這表明儘管令人失望,但圍繞該公司的市場情緒在此期間並未發生太大變化。相反,股價大致跟蹤了EPS的增長。

The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。

big
NasdaqGS:CENT Earnings Per Share Growth October 30th 2024
納斯達克GS:CENt 每股收益增長於2024年10月30日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Before buying or selling a stock, we always recommend a close examination of historic growth trends, available here..

我們很高興地宣佈,該公司的CEO獲得的薪酬比同樣規模的公司的大多數CEO獲得的薪酬更加適度。但是,在購買或出售股票之前,我們始終建議仔細審查公司歷史增長趨勢,這些歷史增長趨勢可以在這裏獲得。真正重要的問題是這家公司未來能否增長收益。

What About Dividends?

關於分紅派息的問題

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, Central Garden & Pet's TSR for the last 3 years was -17%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考慮任何給定股票的股東總回報以及股價回報是很重要的。 股價回報僅反映股價的變化,而TSR包括分紅價值(假設它們被再投資)以及任何折價資本籌集或剝離的好處。 可以說TSR爲支付股息的股票提供了更全面的圖片。 恰好, 中央花園與寵物過去3年的TSR爲-17%,超過了前面提到的股價回報。 毫無疑問,分紅支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧!

A Different Perspective

另一種看法

Central Garden & Pet shareholders gained a total return of 1.4% during the year. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, the longer term returns (running at about 7% a year, over half a decade) look better. Maybe the share price is just taking a breather while the business executes on its growth strategy. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Even so, be aware that Central Garden & Pet is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

中央花園與寵物股東在該年度獲得總回報率爲1.4%。 但這低於市場平均水平。 正面的是,長期回報(在大約半個十年內約爲7%)看起來更好。 也許股價只是在商業執行其增長策略期間稍事休整。 我發現長期來看股價作爲業務表現的一種代理變化非常有趣。 但要真正獲得深入洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 即使如此,請注意,我們的投資分析顯示中央花園與寵物出現了1個警示信號,您應該了解...

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying.

如果您和我一樣,那麼您一定不想錯過這份免費的被內部人員買入的低估小盤股清單。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論