Slowing Rates Of Return At DoubleVerify Holdings (NYSE:DV) Leave Little Room For Excitement
Slowing Rates Of Return At DoubleVerify Holdings (NYSE:DV) Leave Little Room For Excitement
If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. However, after investigating DoubleVerify Holdings (NYSE:DV), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
如果你正在尋找一個多袋股票,有一些事情需要注意。通常,我們會希望注意到資本利用率(ROCE)不斷增長的趨勢,並伴隨着資本利用的擴大。這向我們表明這是一個複利機器,能夠不斷地將其收益重新投資到業務中,併產生更高的回報。然而,在調查DoubleVerify Holdings(紐交所:DV)後,我們認爲它目前的趨勢不符合多袋股票的模式。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
資本僱用回報率(ROCE)是什麼?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for DoubleVerify Holdings, this is the formula:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是一家公司從其所資用的資本中可以產生的稅前利潤的數量。要計算DoubleVerify Holdings的這個指標,可以使用以下公式:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.063 = US$75m ÷ (US$1.3b - US$80m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).
0.063 = 7500萬美元 ÷ (13億美元 - 8000萬美元)(截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。
So, DoubleVerify Holdings has an ROCE of 6.3%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Software industry average of 8.7%.
因此,DoubleVerify Holdings的ROCE爲6.3%。絕對來說,這是一個較低的回報,而且它也低於軟件行業平均水平的8.7%。
In the above chart we have measured DoubleVerify Holdings' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering DoubleVerify Holdings for free.
在上面的圖表中,我們已經測量了DoubleVerify Holdings之前的ROCE與其之前的表現,但未來可能更重要。如果您願意,可以免費查看覆蓋DoubleVerify Holdings的分析師的預測。
How Are Returns Trending?
綜合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其資本利用率所產生的回報。考慮到股票過去五年保持穩定,如果其他指標也不錯,則可能存在機會。因此,進一步研究這家公司並確定這些趨勢是否會持續是合理的。
There are better returns on capital out there than what we're seeing at DoubleVerify Holdings. Over the past five years, ROCE has remained relatively flat at around 6.3% and the business has deployed 191% more capital into its operations. This poor ROCE doesn't inspire confidence right now, and with the increase in capital employed, it's evident that the business isn't deploying the funds into high return investments.
在資本市場中存在比DoubleVerify Holdings更高的資本回報率。在過去的五年中,ROCE保持在6.3%左右相對穩定,業務將更多資本投入運營中,提升191%。當前低 ROCE 令人擔憂,隨着資本投入的增加,明顯業務未將資金投入高回報的投資中。
The Bottom Line
還有一件事需要注意的是,我們已經確定了上海醫藥的2個警告信號,了解這些信號應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。
In conclusion, DoubleVerify Holdings has been investing more capital into the business, but returns on that capital haven't increased. Since the stock has declined 54% over the last three years, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. In any case, the stock doesn't have these traits of a multi-bagger discussed above, so if that's what you're looking for, we think you'd have more luck elsewhere.
總的來說,DoubleVerify Holdings一直在向業務投入更多資本,但該資本的回報並未提升。由於過去三年股價下跌了54%,投資者可能對這種趨勢改善並不太樂觀。不管怎樣,該股並沒有上面討論的大利多特徵,因此如果您正在尋找這樣的潛力股,我們認爲您在其他地方更有幸運。
If you're still interested in DoubleVerify Holdings it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for DV to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.
如果您仍然對DoubleVerify Holdings感興趣,值得查看我們免費提供的有關DV的內在價值近似值,以查看其在其他方面是否以有吸引力的價格交易。
While DoubleVerify Holdings may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
雖然DoubleVerify Holdings目前可能沒有獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前具有超過25%股本回報率的公司清單。請查看這份免費名單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。