share_log

IRay Technology Company Limited's (SHSE:688301) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 42% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%

IRay Technology Company Limited's (SHSE:688301) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 42% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%

奕瑞科技公司有限公司(SHSE:688301)的最大股東是私人公司,持有42%的股份,機構持有37%
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/30 21:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in iRay Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in iRay Technology is 37%
  • 私營公司對奕瑞科技的相當大股權表明它們共同在管理和業務策略上擁有更大的發言權
  • 共有7家投資者擁有該公司的51%所有權。
  • 奕瑞科技的機構所有權爲37%

A look at the shareholders of iRay Technology Company Limited (SHSE:688301) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 42% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察奕瑞科技有限公司(SHSE:688301)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個集團最具影響力。私營公司持有42%的股份,是公司中持股最多的集團。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者如果出現下行),該集團將獲得最大利益(或者損失最大)。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 37% of the company's stockholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

另一方面,機構佔公司股東的37%。大公司通常有機構作爲股東,而在較小的公司中,我們通常看到內部人擁有股份。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about iRay Technology.

讓我們更仔細地看一下,看看不同類型的股東對奕瑞科技有何啓示。

big
SHSE:688301 Ownership Breakdown October 31st 2024
SHSE:688301所有權拆分2024年10月31日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About iRay Technology?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於奕瑞科技?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that iRay Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of iRay Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,奕瑞科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很常見會出現股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查奕瑞科技的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SHSE:688301 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 31st 2024
SHSE:688301 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 31st 2024

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in iRay Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Yiyuan Herui Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shanghai Heyi Investment Management Co., Ltd. and HongShan are the second and third largest shareholders.

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in iRay Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shanghai Yiyuan Herui Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 6.6% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shanghai Heyi Investment Management Co., Ltd. and HongShan are the second and third largest shareholders.

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的挖掘,發現前7名股東持有大約51%的股份,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of iRay Technology

Insider Ownership Of iRay Technology

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that iRay Technology Company Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥11m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息顯示,奕瑞科技股份有限公司的內部持有人擁有公司不到1%的股份。但值得注意的是,內部持有人可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。作爲一家相對龐大的公司,董事會成員可能持有公司的實質性利益,而並非持有較大比例的權益。在這種情況下,他們持有約1100萬元人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持有人總是件好事,但值得注意的是是否這些內部人士一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in iRay Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在奕瑞科技擁有15%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決策偏向他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 6.6% stake in iRay Technology. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資機構持有奕瑞科技6.6%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策方面可能具有影響力。一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵實施能幫助市場認識到公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能在公司上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 42%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司42%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得調查一下誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過獨立的私人公司持有公衆公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand iRay Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with iRay Technology (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解奕瑞科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如,始終存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了奕瑞科技的3個警告信號(至少有1個讓我們有些不舒服),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論