share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Zbom Home Collection Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:603801) Market Cap Rises to CN¥6.3b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Zbom Home Collection Co.,Ltd's (SHSE:603801) Market Cap Rises to CN¥6.3b

內部人員成爲了志邦家居集團有限公司(SHSE:603801)市值上升至人民幣6.3億的主要受益者
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/31 01:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Zbom Home CollectionLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutions own 24% of Zbom Home CollectionLtd
  • 志邦家居有限公司的重要內部股權表明對公司擴張存在固有利益
  • 前4大股東持有51%的業務股份
  • 機構擁有志邦家居有限公司24%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Zbom Home Collection Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603801) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看志邦家居股份有限公司(SHSE:603801)的股東,就能告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,個別內部人員擁有該公司47%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.

因此,內部人士是上週14%收益最大的受益者。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zbom Home CollectionLtd.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了志邦家居有限公司的不同所有權群體。

big
SHSE:603801 Ownership Breakdown October 31st 2024
SHSE:603801 截至2024年10月31日的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zbom Home CollectionLtd?

機構持股告訴我們志邦家居有限公司的情況如何?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Zbom Home CollectionLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Zbom Home CollectionLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到志邦家居有限公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司的一大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過該股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下志邦家居有限公司的歷史收入數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SHSE:603801 Earnings and Revenue Growth October 31st 2024
SHSE:603801 營收和收入增長 2024年10月31日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zbom Home CollectionLtd. Zhi Yong Sun is currently the company's largest shareholder with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 20% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Bang Shun Xu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

對沖基金在志邦家居有限公司的持股不多。孫志勇目前是公司最大的股東,持有21%的股份。第二大股東持有約20%的股份,第三大股東持有5.5%的股份。第二大股東徐邦順同時擔任首席執行官。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Zbom Home CollectionLtd

志邦家居有限公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zbom Home Collection Co.,Ltd. Insiders have a CN¥3.0b stake in this CN¥6.3b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來內部持有志邦家居有限公司相當大比例的股份。 內部持有人在這家63億人民幣的公司中持有30億人民幣的股份。 看到內部持有人如此投入業務真是太棒了。也許值得檢查一下這些內部持有人最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zbom Home CollectionLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

作爲持有25%股份的普通投資者,主要是個人投資者,對志邦家居有限公司有一定的影響力。 雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響政策決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Zbom Home CollectionLtd (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查看一家公司的真實股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了志邦家居有2個警告跡象(其中1個可能嚴重!)在你在這裏投資之前,你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論