share_log

With 73% Institutional Ownership, The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 73% Institutional Ownership, The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有73%的機構持股,《和黃控股》是大佬們的最愛(HK:4)
Simply Wall St ·  2024/10/31 19:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Wharf (Holdings)'s stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • Wheelock and Company Limited owns 68% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有的大部分股份,會德豐的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • Wheelock及其有限公司擁有該公司68%的股份
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls The Wharf (Holdings) Limited (HKG:4), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 73% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道真正控制着會德豐控股有限公司(HKG:4)的是誰,那麼你需要查看其股東登記簿的構成。機構持有73%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,這個集團將從對該公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或損失)

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Wharf (Holdings).

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於九龍倉(集團)的信息。

big
SEHK:4 Ownership Breakdown November 1st 2024
SEHK:4所有權拆分於2024年11月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wharf (Holdings)?

機構持股告訴我們關於九龍倉(集團)的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Wharf (Holdings) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Wharf (Holdings)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到九龍倉(集團)確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看九龍倉(集團)下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SEHK:4 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 1st 2024
SEHK:4盈利和營業收入增長2024年11月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Wharf (Holdings). Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wheelock and Company Limited with 68% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 1.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體施加重要影響力。對於和黃(控股)來說,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是會德豐公司,佔已發行股份的68%。由於他們在所有權中擁有如此龐大的股份,我們推斷他們對公司未來有着重要的控制。值得一提的是,第二大股東持有約1.3%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有0.9%的股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Wharf (Holdings)

和黃(控股)的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Wharf (Holdings) Limited. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own HK$144m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有不到1%的九龍倉(集團)有限公司股份。作爲一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有很小比例的股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值14400萬港元的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Wharf (Holdings). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在九龍倉(集團)持有27%的股份。雖然這個群體不能直接決定事情,但他們確實會對公司的經營產生實質影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論