NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies NewMarket Corporation (NYSE:NEU) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」 因此,當您考慮一隻股票有多大風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。與許多其他公司一樣,newmarket公司(紐交所:NEU)利用債務。 但真正的問題在於,這筆債務是否使公司變得更加危險。
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當一家企業無法輕鬆用自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金時,債務和其他負債會變得風險很高。 資本主義的一大特點是「創造性毀滅」,失敗的企業常常被銀行殘酷清算。 雖然這並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因爲債權人迫使它們以低價籌集資金而不斷稀釋股東。 當然,債務可以是企業的重要工具,尤其是對於資本密集型企業。 在考慮一家企業使用了多少債務時,首先要看其現金和債務合計。
What Is NewMarket's Debt?
newmarket的債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 NewMarket had US$1.09b of debt, an increase on US$779.4m, over one year. However, it also had US$80.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.00b.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示截至2024年9月,newmarket的債務爲10.9億美元,比去年增加了77940萬美元。 然而,它也有8030萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲10億美元。
A Look At NewMarket's Liabilities
了解newmarket的負債
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that NewMarket had liabilities of US$402.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.40b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$80.3m in cash and US$487.6m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.23b.
深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到,newmarket在12個月內到期的負債爲40200萬美元,而超過12個月到期的負債爲14億美元。 抵消這一點,它有8030萬美元的現金和48760萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。 因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和12.3億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since NewMarket has a market capitalization of US$5.04b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
雖然這可能看起來很多,但並不算太糟,因爲newmarket的市值爲50.4億美元,因此如果有需要,它可能通過增加資本來加強資產負債表。 但很明顯,我們絕對應該仔細研究它是否能夠在不稀釋的情況下管理其債務。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。
NewMarket's net debt is only 1.4 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.4 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also good is that NewMarket grew its EBIT at 14% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since NewMarket will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
newmarket的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的1.4倍。 而其EBIt輕鬆覆蓋了利息費用,規模爲11.4倍。 因此,我們對其超保守的債務使用非常放心。 此外,值得一提的是,newmarket過去一年將其EBIt增長了14%,進一步增加了其管理債務的能力。 當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的地方。 但您不能孤立地看待債務;因爲newmarket需要盈利來償還債務。 因此,如果您渴望了解更多關於其盈利的信息,不妨查看其長期盈利趨勢的圖表。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. During the last three years, NewMarket produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 61% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,值得檢查有多少EBIt是由自由現金流支持的。 在過去三年中,newmarket產生穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的61%,這正是我們所期待的。 這種自由現金流使公司具備了償還債務的良好位置,情況適當時可以利用。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, NewMarket's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And its EBIT growth rate is good too. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that NewMarket takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for NewMarket you should be aware of.
令人欣喜的是,newmarket的優越利息保障意味着它在債務方面具有優勢。而且它的EBIt增長率也很不錯。考慮到所有這些數據,我們認爲newmarket對待債務的方式相當明智。雖然這帶來了一些風險,但也可以增加股東的回報。毫無疑問,我們大多數關於債務的了解都來自資產負債表。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。一個案例證明:我們已經發現了newmarket的2個警示信號,您應該注意。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
每天結束時,通常更好地關注那些沒有淨債務的公司。您可以查看我們特別名單上的這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長記錄)。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。