Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well
Individual Investors Who Hold 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Shandong Ruifeng Chemical by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company
- Insider ownership in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is 41%
- 個別投資者對瑞豐高材的重大控制意味着公衆在管理和治理相關決策上有更大的影響力。
- 前25大股東擁有該公司45%的股份。
- 瑞豐高材的內部持股爲41%。
If you want to know who really controls Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300243), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 54% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制瑞豐高材(深交所:300243),那麼你需要查看其股東登記的構成。個別投資者以54%的股份持有公司最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥3.1b last week, while insiders who own 41% also benefitted.
在市值達到31億人民幣的上週,散戶投資者獲得了最大的收益,而持有41%股份的內部人士也從中受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解瑞豐高材的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shandong Ruifeng Chemical?
機構所有權告訴我們關於瑞豐高材什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Less than 5% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
瑞豐高材的機構投資者持股比例不到5%。這表明一些基金正關注該公司,但許多基金尚未購買其股票。如果業務在此基礎上更加強勁,我們可能會看到更多機構願意購入股票的情況。當一些大型機構希望同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股票價格上漲。你可以在下面看到的歷史盈利和營業收入數據可能對考慮更多機構投資者是否希望擁有該股票很有幫助。當然,還有許多其他因素需要考慮。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical. Shibin Zhou is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.2% and 1.6% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Chunxin Liu directly holds 1.3% of the total shares outstanding.
對沖基金在瑞豐高材的持股不多。周世斌目前是公司最大的股東,持有27%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約5.2%和1.6%的股票。此外,公司的首席執行官劉春信直接持有1.3%的流通股。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的股東數據進行更深入的分析顯示,前25大股東總計持有的股份不足登記公司一半,表明存在一大批小股東,沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒也很重要,以了解市場的動向。目前我們沒有獲取到該股票的任何分析師覆蓋數據,因此公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical
瑞豐高材的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shandong Ruifeng Chemical Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥3.1b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在瑞豐高材股份有限公司中持有顯著股份。內部人士在這個31億人民幣的業務中持有13億人民幣的股份。我們認爲這表明了與股東的對齊,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Shandong Ruifeng Chemical. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——持有54%的瑞豐高材。這種持股規模賦予普通投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以並且可能會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Shandong Ruifeng Chemical is showing 6 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those make us uncomfortable...
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。請注意,瑞豐高材在我們的投資分析中顯示出6個警告信號,其中2個讓我們感到不安...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您也可能會在其他地方找到一個絕佳的投資。請查看這個免費的有趣公司名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。