share_log

Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300773) Stock Price Dropped 9.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300773) Stock Price Dropped 9.3% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

拉卡拉支付有限公司(SZSE:300773)的股價上週下跌了9.3%;個人投資者可能會感到不高興
Simply Wall St ·  2024/11/02 07:25

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Lakala Payment by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Lakala Payment is 13%
  • 個人投資者對Lakala Payment的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 前 25 名股東擁有公司 49% 的股份
  • Lakala Payment的內部所有權爲13%

Every investor in Lakala Payment Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300773) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is individual investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

拉卡拉支付有限公司(深圳證券交易所代碼:300773)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司股份最多的集團是個人投資者,準確地說約爲51%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

And following last week's 9.3% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌9.3%之後,個人投資者遭受的損失最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lakala Payment.

在下圖中,我們放大了Lakala Payment的不同所有權組。

big
SZSE:300773 Ownership Breakdown November 1st 2024
SZSE: 300773 所有權明細 2024 年 11 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lakala Payment?

關於Lakala付款,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據近似於當地市場的指數來衡量自己的表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lakala Payment. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lakala Payment's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

如您所見,機構投資者在Lakala Payment中擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Lakala Payment的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
SZSE:300773 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 1st 2024
SZSE: 300773 2024 年 11 月 1 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lakala Payment. The company's largest shareholder is Legend Holdings Corporation, with ownership of 27%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Sun Taoran, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of President.

對沖基金在Lakala Payment中的股票不多。該公司的最大股東是聯想控股公司,擁有27%的所有權。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約10%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有2.8%的所有權。第二大股東孫陶然也恰好擁有總裁頭銜。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前25名股東總共持有不到登記冊的一半,這表明一大批小股東沒有單一股東佔多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Lakala Payment

Lakala Payment 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

不同國家對內部人員的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Lakala Payment Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥16b, and insiders have CN¥2.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有Lakala支付有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲160元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值20元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 51% stake in Lakala Payment, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Lakala Payment51%的大量股份,這表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權規模賦予了公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以而且可能確實會影響有關高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議業務收購的決策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 27% of Lakala Payment stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

上市公司目前擁有Lakala Payment27%的股票。這可能是戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。可能是他們已經消失了。這一裁定可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Lakala Payment you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的3個Lakala Payment警告信號,其中一個信號很重要。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論