share_log

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InDBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

Institutions Along With Individual Investors Who Hold Considerable Shares InDBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023) Come Under Pressure; Lose 11% of Holdings Value

機構和持有大量股份的個人投資者受到壓力; 在DBAPPSecurity Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:688023) 中損失了11%的持股價值
Simply Wall St ·  11/02 08:26

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • DBAPPSecurity's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders own 17% of DBAPPSecurity
  • DBAPPSecurity的重要個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大發行公衆的股東影響。
  • 前8大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 內部人持有DBAPPSecurity公司17%的股份。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688023), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 38% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着DBAPPSecurity有限公司(SHSE:688023),理解這家公司的所有權結構非常重要。個人投資者以38%的股份擁有公司最多的股份。換句話說,這個團體從他們對公司的投資中獲得的收益(或損失)最大。

While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 11% price drop, institutions with their 25% holdings also suffered.

在上週價格下跌11%後,個人投資者的持股受到影響,而持有25%股份的機構也遭受了損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of DBAPPSecurity.

在下面的圖表中,我們詳細分析了DBAPPSecurity的不同持有群體。

big
SHSE:688023 Ownership Breakdown November 2nd 2024
SHSE:688023 持股分佈 2024年11月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DBAPPSecurity?

機構持股告訴我們關於DBAPPSecurity的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DBAPPSecurity. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DBAPPSecurity's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在DBAPPSecurity中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對這隻股票進行了分析,並且他們看好它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會錯。當多個機構共同持有一隻股票時,始終存在着「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司來說,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到DBAPPSecurity的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總有更多的故事。

big
SHSE:688023 Earnings and Revenue Growth November 2nd 2024
SHSE:688023 盈利與營業收入增長 2024年11月2日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in DBAPPSecurity. Our data shows that Yuan Fan is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.8% of the stock.

對沖基金在DBAPPSecurity的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Yuan Fan是最大股東,持有17%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約10%和6.8%的股票。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前8大股東佔據了超過一半的股份登記,幾個較小的股東在一定程度上平衡了較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的一個好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現這一點。相當多的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長情況。

Insider Ownership Of DBAPPSecurity

DBAPPSecurity的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部人持股是一種積極的現象,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情況下,這個群體內的權力可能過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of DBAPPSecurity Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥4.6b, and insiders have CN¥772m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有DBAPPSecurity有限公司合理的股份比例。它的市值僅爲46億人民幣,內部人士持有價值77200萬人民幣的股票。看到內部人士如此投入於業務是非常好的。檢查這些內部人士最近是否有買入值得關注。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆——包括散戶投資者——在公司中持有38%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 10% stake in DBAPPSecurity. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私募股權公司持有DBAPPSecurity 10%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們看到私募股權會長揸,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,並且——就如其名稱所示——不太會投資於上市公司。在一段時間後,他們可能會選擇出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.5%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到私營公司擁有9.5%的股份。從這個事實單獨來看,很難得出任何結論,因此值得深入了解誰擁有那些私營公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過一個單獨的私營公司對上市公司的股份有興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with DBAPPSecurity .

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素甚至更爲重要。 爲此,您應該注意我們發現的DBAPPSecurity的一個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論