MLOptic's (SHSE:688502) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear
MLOptic's (SHSE:688502) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear
Investors were disappointed with MLOptic Corp.'s (SHSE:688502) recent earnings. We think there is more to the story than simply soft profit numbers. Our analysis shows that there are some other factors of concern.
投資者對MLOptic公司(SHSE:688502)最近的收益感到失望。我們認爲這個故事並不僅僅是利潤數字較低。我們的分析顯示還有一些其他令人擔憂的因素。
Zooming In On MLOptic's Earnings
聚焦MLOptic的收益情況
As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.
作爲財務迷已經了解的,現金流的應計比率是評估公司自由現金流(FCF)與利潤匹配情況的關鍵指標。爲了得到應計比率,我們首先要從一個時期的利潤中減去FCF,然後將這個數字除以該時期的平均營運資產。你可以將現金流的應計比率視爲「非FCF的獲利比例」。
Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,實際上是一件好事,但如果其應計比率爲正,則是一件壞事。雖然應計比率爲零以上的事情無關緊要,但我們認爲當公司的應計比率相對較高時,值得注意。引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年發表的一篇論文:「應計越高的公司未來利潤率越低」。
For the year to September 2024, MLOptic had an accrual ratio of 0.42. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Even though it reported a profit of CN¥34.9m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through CN¥292m in the last year. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of CN¥292m, this year, indicates high risk. However, that's not all there is to consider. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.
截至2024年9月份,MLOptic的應計比率爲0.42。通常情況下,這對未來的盈利來說不樂觀。而事實上,在這段時期內,該公司根本沒有產生任何自由現金流。即使報告顯示盈利爲3490萬人民幣,但自由現金流的數據表明,在過去一年中它實際上虧損了29200萬元人民幣。在去年出現負自由現金流之後,我們可以想象一些股東可能會懷疑,今年2.92億元人民幣的現金燒損是否表明高風險。然而,並不是所有的事情只看這些。應計比率反映了非正常項目對法定盈利的影響,至少在一定程度上。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
除了稀釋之外,還應該注意的是,萬集科技在過去12個月中因不尋常項目獲得了價值人民幣3.5萬元的利潤。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當這些不尋常項目對利潤做出重大貢獻時,我們會更加謹慎。我們對全球大部分上市公司的數據進行了分析,發現不尋常項目往往是一次性的。這正如我們所期望的那樣,因爲這些提升被描述爲"不尋常"。相對於其利潤而言,萬集科技在2021年12月前的不尋常項目貢獻大。因此,我們可以推斷出,這些不尋常項目正在使其財務利潤顯著增強。
The fact that the company had unusual items boosting profit by CN¥6.4m, in the last year, probably goes some way to explain why its accrual ratio was so weak. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. If MLOptic doesn't see that contribution repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to drop over the current year.
公司上一年扶持營業收入640萬人民幣的飛凡項目是事實,這可能部分解釋了其應計比率如此疲弱的原因。我們無法否認,更高的利潤通常讓我們感到樂觀,但我們更希望利潤能夠持續。我們對全球大多數上市公司進行了數據分析,飛凡項目一次性的特性是非常普遍的。鑑於其名字,這並不奇怪。如果MLOptic未能看到該貢獻再現,那麼其他條件相等的情況下,我們預計其利潤在當前年度將會下降。
Our Take On MLOptic's Profit Performance
我們對MLOptic的利潤表現持懷疑態度
MLOptic had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue MLOptic's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for MLOptic you should be aware of.
MLOptic的應計比率較低,但其利潤確實受益於飛凡項目。考慮到這一切,我們認爲MLOptic的利潤可能過分誇大了其可持續盈利水平。基於這一點,除非我們對風險有透徹的了解,否則我們不會考慮投資於該股。舉例說明:我們已發現MLOptic存在2個警示信號,您應該注意。
In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.
在本文中,我們已經查看了許多影響利潤數據實用性的因素,並對此持謹慎態度。但是,還有許多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。例如,許多人認爲高股權回報率是企業經濟有利的指標,而其他人則喜歡「跟着錢」的思路,並尋找內部人員購買的股票。雖然這可能需要一些您自己的研究,但是您可能會發現這個由高股權回報率的公司組成的免費集合,或者這個擁有重要內部人員持股的股票列表有用。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。